|
Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 142-147
|
Comparison between saliva stimulants and a saliva substitute in patients with xerostomia and hyposalivation
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
SALIVA SUBSTITUTE;
SORBITOL;
SUGAR;
SUGAR ALCOHOL;
SWEETENING AGENT;
XYLITOL;
ADULT;
AGED;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CHEWING GUM;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CROSSOVER PROCEDURE;
DRUG EFFECT;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NONPARAMETRIC TEST;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SALIVATION;
SECRETION;
SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
STIMULATION;
XEROSTOMIA;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
CANDY;
CHEWING GUM;
CROSS-OVER STUDIES;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
SALIVA, ARTIFICIAL;
SALIVATION;
SECRETORY RATE;
SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;
SORBITOL;
STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;
STIMULATION, CHEMICAL;
SUGAR ALCOHOLS;
SWEETENING AGENTS;
XEROSTOMIA;
XYLITOL;
|
EID: 0032106733
PISSN: 02751879
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1998.tb01136.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (33)
|
References (2)
|