Comparision of magnified chemiluminescent examination with incandescent light examination and colposcopy for detection of cervical neoplasia

Indian Journal of Cancer

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 81-87

  Suneja, Amita ^a   Mahishee, ^a   Agarwal, N ^a   Misra, K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMOLUMINESCENCE; COLPOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADULT; CHEMILUMINESCENT MEASUREMENTS; COLPOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0032105093     PISSN: 0019509X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Morell N.D., Taylor J. R. Synder R. N. et al.: False negative cytology rates in patients in whome invasive cancer subsequently developed. Obstet Gynecol 1982: 41;60.
2. Leopald G. Koss. : The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection : A triumph and a tragedy. JAMA 1989:261; 737-743.
3. Sehgal A., Singh V., Bhambane S., Luthra V.K. : Screening for cervical cancer by direct inspection. Lancet 1991:338;282.
4. Ottaviano M., La Torre P. : Examination of the cervix with the naked eye using acetic acid test. Am J. Obstet Gynacol 1982: 143;139-142.
5. Linda Van Le, Freidrik F., Borckhuizen et al. : Acetic acid visualisation of the cerevix to detect cervical neoplasia. Obslet Gynecol 1992: 81(2) ; 293-295.
6. Katsumi T., Forsythe A., Karen Cove J et al. : A comparison of the Pap Smear and the cervicogram: Sersitivity, specificity and cost analysis. Obstet Gynaecol 1988: 71 (2): 229-235.
7. Garcia J. Scott R. J. : Speculoscopy- A new method for cervical screens. Proceedings of American Society of Colposcopy and cervical pathology. March 1992, Orlando FL page 52.
8. Lonky N. M. and Edwards G. : Comparison of Chemiluminsecent light versus incandescent light in the visualisation of acetowhite epithelium. Am. J. Gynecol Health 1992: 6(1) ; 111-15.
9. Lonky N.M. and Edwards G. : Biophysical properties of a unique chemiluminescent light source utilized during speculoscopy. A new magnified intra-vaginal examination. Proceedings of American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. March 1992, Orlando FL Page 52.
10. Sauer M.V., Francis M., Macaso T et al.: The effect of Chemiluminescent light exposure on the invitro development of mouse embryos. J. In-vitro Fertil Embryo Transf 1991: 8:290.
11. Ability of a visual test to predict underlying cervical neoplasia: Colposcopy and speculoscopy. J. Reprod Med 1995 Jul; 40(7):530-6.
12. Masad L. S., Lonky N. M., Mutch D.G., et al. : Use of speculos copy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears : Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy. J. Reprod Med 1993; 38:636-169.
13. Ismail S. M., Colelough A.B., Dinen J.S. et al. : Observer variation in histologic diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br Med J. 1989; 298 : 707-710.
14. Robertson A. J., Anderson J. M., Beck J. S., et al. : Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. J. Clin Path 1989; 42 : 231-238.
15. Singh K., Das S.K., Nayar M., Suneja A.,: Colposcopic and histopathological correlation of benign acanthotic nonglycogenated surface epithelium of cervix uteri. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci (India) 1993: 29(4) ; 273-276.
16. Skehan M., Soutter W.P., Lim K., et al.: Reliability of Colposcopy and directed Punch biopsy. Br. J. obstet Gynecol 1990; 97 : 811-816.
17. Mann W., Lonky N., Massad S., et al.: Papanicolaou Smear screening augmented by a magnified chemiluminescent. exam. Int J. Gynecol obstet 1993: 43; 289-296.