Restructuring and competition in international telecommunications: the case of INTELSAT

Information Economics and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 197-218

  Einhorn, Michael A ^a  

^a 320 West 57 St   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; ECONOMICS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MARKETING; PRIVATIZATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TELECOMMUNICATION;

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS; NONPROFIT; RESTRUCTURING;

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

INDUSTRIAL COMPETITTION; INTELSAT; PRIVATISATION; TELECOMMUNICATIONS;

EID: 0032103698     PISSN: 01676245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6245(97)00024-3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ABC, CBS, NBC, and TBS, 1995. Position on Proposed INTELSAT Restructuring, unpublished document.
2. Blackley, N., Watts, T., 1997. The Global Satellite Marketplace. Merrill Lynch, New York.
3. Boeke and Fernandez, 1997. Via Satellite's Global Satellite Survey, Phillips 1997 Satellite Industry Directory. Phillips Publishing Company, Potomac MD.
4. European Economic Commission, 1994. Directive No. 94/46/EC of October 13, 1994, Commission Directive of October 13, 1994 Amending Directive 88/301/EEC and Directive 90/388/EEC in Particular with Regard to Satellite Communications, 94L 268/15 (Brussels).
5. Federal Communications Commission, 1995. In the matter of market entry and regulation of foreign-affiliated entities. IB Docket No. 95-22, RM-8355, RM-8392, Washington.
6. Federal Communications Commission, 1996a. In the matter of amendment to the commission's regulatory policies governing domestic fixed satellites and separate international satellite systems. IB Docket No. 95-41, Washington.
7. Federal Communications Commission, 1996b. In the matter of Comsat corporation, petition for partial relief from the current regulatory treatment of Comsat World Systems' switched voice, private line, and video and audio services. RM Docket No. 7913, Washington.
8. Federal Communications Commission, 1996c. In the matter of regulation of international accounting rates. CC Docket No. 90-337, Phase II, Washington.
9. Federal Communications Commission, 1997a. Establishment of rules and policies for the digital audio radio satellite service. IB Docket No. 95-95, Gen Docket No. 90-357, Washington.
10. Federal Communications Commission, 1997b. In the matter of assignment of orbital locations to space stations in the Ka-band. IB Docket No. 97-95, Washington.
11. Federal Communications Commission, 1997c. In the matter of international settlement rates. IB Docket No. 96-261, Washington.
12. Frieden, R., 1996. Privatization of satellite cooperatives: smothering a golden goose? Presented at Conference, INTELSAT Restructure and Satellite Competition, April 26, 1996. Columbia Institute for Tele-Information, New York.
13. Friedland, J., 1995. Chile's ENTEL seeks long-distance fare. Wall Street Journal, June 5 1995, p. A10.
14. Frost, M., 1996. Remarks, presented at Conference, INTELSAT Restructure and Satellite Competition, April 26, 1996. Columbia Institute for Tele-Information, New York.
15. Houthakker, H., and The Brattle Group, 1994. Competition in the Market for Trans-oceanic Facilities-based Telecommunications Services. The Brattle Group, Cambridge MA.
16. Houthakker, H., and The Brattle Group, 1996. Competition in the Market for Trans-Oceanic Video Services To and From the U.S. The Brattle Group, Cambridge MA.
17. INTELSAT, 1995. Annual Report. INTELSAT, Washington.
18. International Telecommunications Union, 1992. Accounting rate principles for international telephone services, Recommendation D.140. International Telecommunications Union, Geneva.
19. Irwin, S., 1996. Remarks, presented at Conference, INTELSAT Restructure and Satellite Competition, April 26, 1996. Columbia Institute for Tele-Information, New York.
20. Jackson, C., Haring, J., Shooshan, H.M. III, Rohlfs, J.H., Pehrsson, K.M., 1996. Public harms unique to satellite spectrum auctions. Strategic Policy Research, Bethesda MD.
21. Kwerel, E.R., McNally, J.E., 1986. Promoting competition between international telecommunication cables and satellites. Office of Plans and Policy, Federal Communications Commission, Washington.
22. Meltzer, D., 1996. Private correspondence. INTELSAT, Washington.
23. Neven D., Roller L.H., Waverman L. Sunk in space: the economics of the European satellite industry and prospects for liberalization. Economic Policy. 16:1993;402-432.
24. Orion Network Systems, Inc., 1995. Prospectus. Orion, Rockville MD.
25. PanAmSat Corporation, 1995. Prospectus. PanAmSat, Greenwich CT.
26. Pierce, A., Carlson, R., 1997. Debunking the cellular myth in the emerging mobile satellite communications arena. Unpublished paper, Information Age Economics, Washington.
27. Rees, D.W.E., 1997. Restructuring: the view of a private carrier. Unpublished paper, DaiLink SatComs, Ltd., Vienna, VA.
28. Telecommunications Reports, 2/24/97, p. 1.
29. Telecommunications Reports, 4/23/97, p. 23.
30. Waverman, L., 1996. The political economy of international telecommunications organizations, breaking up is hard to do. Presented at conference, INTELSAT Restructure and Satellite Competition, April 26, 1996. Columbia Institute for Tele-Information, New York.
31. Wear, D., 1996. Private correspondence, INTELSAT, Washington, DC.
32. Zeger, W.Y., Polsky, H.D., Fagan, K.H., Wiley, R.E., Permut, P.V., Harold, R.C., 1996. Petition for partial relief from the current regulatory treatment of COMSAT World Systems' switched voice, private line, and video and audio services, before the Federal Communications Commission. RM-7913 Washington.