Chromatic induction: Border contrast or adaptation to surrounding light?

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1561-1566

  Shevell, Steven K ^a   Wei, Jianping ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatic context; Chromatic induction; Chromaticity; Color appearance; Complex images; Contrast gain control

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; CONTRAST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIGHT; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0032103287     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00006-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. [1] Anstis S, Cavanagh P. A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance. In: Mollon JD, Sharpe LT, editors. Colour Vision: Physiology and Psychophysics. London: Academic Press, 1983:155-166.
2. [2] Brown RO, MacLeod DIA. Color appearance depends on the variance of surround colors. Curr Biol 1997;7:844-9.
3. [3] Chevreul ME. The Principles of Harmony and Contrast of Colors and Their Applications to the Arts (Original English translation, 1854, republished, 1967). New York: Reinhold, 1839.
4. [4] Chubb C, Sperling G, Solomon JA. Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:9631-5.
5. [5] Helson H. Fundamental problems in color vision. I. The principle governing changes in hue, saturation, and lightness of non-selective samples in chromatic illumination. J Exp Psychol 1938;23:439-76.
6. [6] Hood DC, Finkelstein MA. Sensitivity to light. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP, editors. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol. I: Sensory Processes and Perception. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986:5-1-5-66.
7. [7] Jameson D, Hurvich LM. Some quantitative aspects of an opponent-colors theory. I. Chromatic responses and spectral saturation. J Opt Soc Am 1955;45:546-52.
8. [8] Jameson D, Hurvich L. Opponent chromatic induction: Experimental evaluation and theoretical account. J Opt Soc Am 1961;51:46-53.
9. [9] Judd DB. Colorimetry and artificial daylight. In: Technical Committee No. 7 Report of Secretariat United States Commission, International Commission on Illumination, Twelfth Session, Stockholm 1951:1-60.
10. [10] Krauskopf J, Zaidi Q. Induced desensitization. Vis Res 1986;26:759-62.
11. [11] Schirillo JA, Shevell SK. Brightness contrast from inhomogeneous surrounds. Vis Res 1996;36:1783-96.
12. [12] Shevell SK. The dual role of chromatic backgrounds in color perception. Vis Res 1978;18:1649-61.
13. [13] Shevell SK. Processes mediating color contrast. Die Farbe 1987;34:261-8.
14. [14] Shevell SK, Burroughs TJ. Light spread and scatter from some common adapting stimuli. Vis Res 1988;28:605-9.
15. [15] Singer B, D'Zmura M. Color contrast induction. Vis Res 1994;34:3111-26.
16. [16] Singer B, D'Zmura M. Contrast gain control: A bilinear model for chromatic selectivity. J Opt Soc Am A 1995;12:667-85.
17. [17] Smith VC, Pokorny J. Chromatic discrimination axes, CRT phosphor spectra and individual variation in color vision. J Opt Soc Am A 1995;12:27-35.
18. [18] Valberg P, Lange-Malecki B. 'Color Constancy' in Mondrian patterns: a partial cancellation of physical chromaticity shifts by simultaneous contrast. Vis Res 1990;30:371-80.
19. [19] Walraven J. Spatial characteristics of chromatic induction; the segregation of lateral effects from straylight artefacts. Vis Res 1973;13:1739-53.
20. [20] Ware C, Cowan WB. Changes in perceived color due to chromatic interactions. Vis Res 1982;22:1353-62.
21. [21] Webster MA, Mollon JD. Colour constancy influenced by contrast adaptation. Nature 1995;373:694-8.
22. [22] Wei J, Shevell SK. Color appearance under chromatic adaptation varied along theoretically significant axes in color space. J Opt Soc Am A 1995;12:36-46.