Comprehension of pictorial symbols: Effects of context and test method

Human Factors

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 173-186

  Wolff, Jennifer Snow ^a,c,d   Wogalter, Michael S ^b,e  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Graphic Info and Intrac Des Dept   (United States)

^e RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; ERGONOMICS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PHOTOGRAPHY;

COMPREHENSION; CONTEXT; PICTORIAL SYMBOLS;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; METHODOLOGY; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; PHOTOGRAPHY; SYMBOLISM;

EID: 0032102605     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872098779480433     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (1991). Accredited standard on safety colors, signs, symbols, labels, and tags, Z535.1-5. Washington, DC: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
2. Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1973). Searching for objects in real world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 22-27.
3. Boersema, T., & Zwaga, H. J. G. (1989). Selecting comprehensible warning symbols for swimming pool slides. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 994-998). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
4. Brugger, C. (1994). Public information symbols: A comparison of ISO testing procedures. In Proceedings of Public Graphics (pp. 26.1-26.10) Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht, Department of Psychonomics.
5. Cahill, M. C. (1975). Interpretability of graphic symbols as a function of context and experience factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 376-380.
6. Collins, B. (1983). Use of hazard symbols/pictorials in the minerals industry (Report NBSIR 83-2732). Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
7. Dewar, R. (1994). Design and evaluation of graphic symbols. In Proceedings of Public Graphics (pp. 24.1-24.18). Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht, Department of Psychonomics.
8. Dewar, R., & Arthur, P. (1994). Warning of water safety hazards with cartoon images. In Proceedings of Public Graphics (pp. 7.1-7.10). Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht, Department of Psychonomics.
9. Eberhard, J. & Green, D. (1988). The development and testing of warnings for automotive lifts (Tech. Report UMTRI-89-26). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
10. Goldhaber, G. M., & DeTurck, M. A. (1988). Effectiveness of warning signs: Gender and familiarity effects. Journal of Products Liability, 11, 271-284.
11. International Standards Organization (ISO). (1984). International standard for safety colours and safety signs: ISO 3864. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
12. Katz, S., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1994). Answering reading comprehension items without passages on the SAT, the ACT, and the GRE. Educational Assessment, 2, 295-308.
13. Laux, L. F., Mayer, D. L., & Thompson, N. B. (1989). Usefulness of symbols and pictorials to communicate hazard information. In Proceedings of Interface '89 (pp. 79-83). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
14. Lerner, N. D., & Collins, B. L. (1980). The assessment of safety symbol understandability by different testing methods (PB81-185647). Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
15. Magurno, A., Wogalter, M. S., Kohake, J., & Wolff, J. S. (1994). Iterative test and development of pharmaceutical pictorials. In Proceedings of the 12th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (Vol. 4, pp. 360-362). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Human Factors Association of Canada.
16. Neisser, U. (1987). The present and the past. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on the Practical Aspects of Memory, Swansea, Wales.
17. Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519-526.
18. Silver, N. C., Wogalter, M. S., Brewster, B. M., Glover, B. L., Murray, L. A., Tillotson, C. A., & Temple, T. L. (1995). Comprehension and perceived quality of warning symbols. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (pp. 1057-1061). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
19. Tulving, E., Mandler, G., & Baumal, R. (1964). Interaction of two sources of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 381-391.
20. United States Pharmacopoeial Convention. (1993). "Pharmaceutical icon symbols." Rockville, MD: Author [http://www. usp.org].
21. Vukelich, M., & Whitaker, L. A. (1993). The effects of context on the comprehension of graphic symbols. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 511-515). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
22. Wogalter, M. S., & Marwitz, D. B. (1987). The effect of selecting multiple-choice distractor items around a single target alternative. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 378-381). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
23. Wogalter, M. S., Marwitz, D. B., & Leonard, D. C. (1992). Suggestiveness in photospread lineups: Similarity induces distinctiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 443-453.
24. Wogalter, M. S., Sojourner, R., & Brelsford, J. W. (1997). Comprehension and training of safety pictorials. Ergonomics, 40, 531-542.
25. Wogalter, M. S., & Wolff, J. S. (1998, August). Pictorial symbols: Influence of testing technique and context on comprehension. Paper to be presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, San Francisco, CA.
26. Wolff, J. S. (1995). A study of context and test method in evaluating safety symbols (Tech. Report GIT-GVU-96-07). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center [http://ftp.gvu.gatech.edu/pub/gvu/tech-reports/ 96-07.ps.Z].
27. Wolff, I. S., & Wogalter, M. S. (1993). Test and development of pharmaceutical pictorials. In Proceedings of Interface '93 (pp. 187-192). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
28. Zwaga, H. J. G., & Easterby, R. S. (1984). Developing effective symbols for public information. In H. J. G. Zwaga & R. S. Easterby (Eds.), Information design: The design and evaluation of signs and printed material (pp. 277-297). New York: Wiley.