Water quality concerns and regulatory controls for nonstorm water discharges to storm drains

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 661-676

  Duke, L Donald ^a   Kihara, Molly M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Belt Collins Hawai'i   (United States)

Author keywords

Nonpoint source pollution; Separate storm sewers; Storm water management; Urban runoff; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PUBLIC POLICY; RUNOFF; STORM SEWERS; URBAN PLANNING; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

EID: 0032102204     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb00963.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program, 1994. Recommended Discharge Elimination/Disposal Priorities for Wash Waters. Alameda County Department of Public Works, Hayward, California.
2. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, 1996. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, Municipal Stormwater Permit. Order No. 96-054, NPDES No. CAS614001. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles, Monterey Park, California.
3. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, 1984. A Resolution for Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Certain Types of Discharges, Resolution No. 84-48. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana, Riverside, California.
4. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, 1996. Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Specific Types of Discharges, Resolution No. 96-9. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana, Riverside, California.
5. California State Water Resources Control Board, 1995. Annual Report for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, 1994-95. California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, California.
6. California State Water Resources Control Board, 1997. Water Quality Order No. 97-03-DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, General Permit No. CAS000001, Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Associated With Industrial Activities Excluding Construction Activities. California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, California.
7. Code of Federal Regulations, 1995. Title 40, Part 122, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; Section 122.42, Additional Conditions Applicable to Specified Categories of NPDES Permits. U.S. General Services Administration, National Archives and Records Service, Washington, D.C.
8. Duke, L. D., J. Lilien, M. Kihara, T. Lo, P. Harris, and L. Ganse, 1997. Evaluation of Non-Storm Water Discharges to California Storm Drains and Potential Policies for Effective Prohibition Methods, Final Report. Report to California State Water Resources Control Board, Contract No. 5-104-140-0, Academic Publishing, Associated Students of UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
9. Larry Walker Associates, 1992. Final Discharge Characterization Report. Sacramento County Water Agency, Sacramento, California.
10. Lau, S., M. K. Stenstrom, and S. Bay, 1994. Assessment of Storm Drain Sources of Contaminants to Santa Monica Bay. Volume V, UCLA Eng Report 94-100, UCLA School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
11. Line, D. E., D. L. Osmond, R. Cannon, S. W. Coffey, G. D. Jennings, J. A. Gale, and J. Spooner, 1996. Nonpoint Sources. Water Environment Research 68(4):720-733.
12. Mathews, S. and R. Welsh, 1995. Report of Waste Discharges (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Application) for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore Site Non-Stormwater Discharges. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, California.
13. Montoya, B. L., 1987. Urban Runoff Discharges From Sacramento, California, 1984-1985. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Report No. 87-1SPSS.
14. Percival, Robert V., Alan S. Miller, Christopher H. Schroeder, and James P. Leape, 1992. Environmental Regulation: Law, Science, and Policy. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, Massachusetts.
15. Pitt, R. and J. McLean, 1986. Toronto Area Watershed Management Strategy Study; Humber River Pilot Watershed Project, Final Report. The Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Ontario.
16. Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program, 1995. Guidelines for Non-Storm Water Discharges to the Storm Drain System. Santa Clara Valley Water District, San Jose, California.
17. Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program, 1997. Conditionally Exempted Discharges: Classification and Control Measures. Santa Clara Valley Water District, San Jose, California.
18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995. Storm Water Discharges Potentially Addressed By Phase II of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Storm Water Program, Report to Congress. EPA-833-K-94-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991. De Minimis Discharges Study, Report to Congress. EPA-440-91-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Application Regulations for Storm Water Discharges, Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, v. 55(222), pp. 47990-48091.