Response of fiber-reinforced polymers to high strain-rate loading in interlaminar tension and combined tension/shear

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 987-996

  Lifshitz, J M ^a   Leber, H ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULI; EPOXY RESINS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GLASS FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; NONMETALLIC MATRIX COMPOSITES; STRAIN GAGES; STRAIN RATE; STRESS ANALYSIS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

HOPKINSON BAR TECHNIQUE; SOFTWARE PACKAGE NASTRAN;

FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS;

COMPOSITES, FIBRE-REINFORCED; INTERLAMINAR SHEAR STRENGTH; LOADING;

EID: 0032098482     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00226-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 1. Ross, C. A. and Sierakowsky, R. L., Dynamic compressive properties of a metal-matrix composite material. Proceedings 16th SAMPE National Symposium, Anaheim, California, 1971, pp. 109-121.
2. 2. Griffiths, L. J. and Martin, D. J., A study of the dynamic behavior of a carbon-fiber composite using the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Phys. D; Appl. Phys., 1974, 7, 2329-2341.
3. 3. Bai, Y. L. and Harding, J., Fracture initiation in glass-reinforced plastics under impact loading, Mechanical Properties at High Rates of Strain. Institute of Physics Conference, Oxford, 1984, pp. 339-350.
4. 4. Harding, J. and Welsh, L. M., A tensile testing technique for fiber reinforced composites at impact rates of strain. J. Mater. Sci., 1983, 18, 1810-1826.
5. 5. Ross, C. A., Cook, W. H. and Wilson, L. L., Dynamic tensile tests of composite materials using a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Experimental Techniques, 1984, 8, 30-33.
6. 6. Liu, Z. G. and Chiem, C. Y., A new technique for tensile testing of composite materials at high strain rates. Experimental Techniques, 1988, 12, 20-21.
7. -1. Report No. 1080, 69, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, 1969.
8. 8. Hartley, K. A., Duffy, J. and Hawley, R. H. The torsional Kolsky (split Hopkinson) bar. Metals Handbook, 9th edn. Am. Soc. Metals, 1985, Vol. 8, p. 218.
9. 9. Harding, J. and Li, Y. I., Determination of interlaminar shear strength for glass/epoxy and carbon epoxy laminates at impact rates of strain. Compos. Sci. Technol., 1992, 45(4), 161-171.
10. 10. Dong, L. and Harding, J., A Single lap shear specimen for determining the effect of strain rate on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon fiber reinforced laminates. Composites, 1994, 25(2), 129-138.
11. 11. Harding, J. and Dong, L., Effect of strain rate on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon fiber reinforced laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol., 1994, 51, 347-358.
12. 12. Chiem, C. Y. and Liu, Z. G., High strain rate behavior of carbon fiber composites. In Mechanical Behavior of Composites and Laminates, Proc. of the European Mechanics Colloquium 214, ed. W. A. Green and M. Micunovic. Kupari, Yugoslavia, 1986, pp. 45-53.
13. 13. Bouette, B., Cazeneuve, C. and Oytana, C., Shear in carbon/epoxy laminates at various strain rates. In Proc. ECCM-4, Stuttgart, FRG, 1990, pp. 937-942.
14. 14. Bouette, B., Cazeneuve, C. and Oytana, C., Effect of strain rate on interlaminar shear properties of carbon/ epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol., 1992, 45, 313-321.
15. 15. Lagace, P. A. and Weems, D. B., A through the thickness strength specimen for composites, TELAC, Tech. Lab for Advanced Composites, MIT. Presented at the 2nd ASTM Symposium on Test Methods and Design Allowables, Phoenix, Arizona, 1986.
16. 16. Munjal, A. K., Test methods for characterization of fiber reinforced composites. JANNAF CMCS/S & MBS Joint Subcommittee Meeting, CPIA Publication, 1984, 418(1), 141-154.
17. 17. SRI Report, Material characterization of Kevlar 49/UF-3282, S-2 Glass/UF3282,DC-20 Kevlar 49/UF-3282 and 3415-2 Glass Cloth/UF-3282 Material Systems. SRI-EAS-83-304-4618, April 1983.
18. 18. Ishai, O., Strengthening of composite materials in the third dimension, Annual Report for the First Research Year. Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, January, 1995.
19. 19. Ko, W. L. and Jackson, R. H., Multilayer theory for delamination analysis of composite curved bar subjected to end forces and end moments. NASA TM 4139, Sepember 1989.
20. 20. Hiel, C. C., Sumich, M. and Chappell, D. P., A curved beam test specimen for determining the interlaminar strength of a laminated composite. J. Compos. Mater., 1991, 25, 854-868.
21. 21. Jackson, W. C. and Martin, R. H., An interlaminar tension strength specimen, Symposium on Composite Materials: Testing and Design, ASTM STP 1206, ed. by E. T. Camponeshi, Jr. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1993, pp. 333-354.
22. 22. Daniel, I. M. and Ishai, O., Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials. Oxford University Press Publications, New York, 1994.
23. 23. Davies, E. D. H. and Hunter, S. C., The dynamic compression testing of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1963, 11, 155-179.
24. 24. Malinowski, J. Z. and Klepaczko, J. R., A unified numerical and analytical approach to specimen behavior in the split Hopkinson pressure bar. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1986, 28(6), 381-391.
25. 25. Bertholf, L. D. and Karnes, C. H., Two dimensional analysis of split Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1975, 23, 1-19.
26. 26. Anderson, C. E., O'Donoghue, P. E., Lankford, J. and Walker, J. D., Numerical simulations of SHPB experiments for the dynamic compressive strength and failure of ceramics. Int. J. Fracture, 1992, 55, 193-208.
27. 27. Chen, W., Subhash, G. and Ravichandran, G., Evaluation of ceramic specimen geometries used in split Hopkinson pressure bar. DYMAT Journal, 1994, 1(3), 193-210.
28. 28. Parry, T. and Harding, J., The failure of glass-reinforced composites under dynamic torsional loading. In Plastic Behavior of Anisotropic Solids, ed. J. P., Boehler. Colloque Int. du CNRS No 319, Paris, 1988, pp. 271-288.
29. 29. Leber, H. and Lifshitz, J. M., Interlaminar shear behavior of plain weave GFRP at static and high rates of strain. Compos. Sci. Technol., 1996, 56, 391-405.
30. 30. Lindholm, U. S., Some experiments with the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1964, 12, 317-335.
31. 31. Gandelsman, M. and Ishai, O., Assessment of delamination failure of laminated composite beam with geometrical discontinuity. In Computer Aided Design in Composite Material Technology V, ed. W. R. Blain and W. P. DeWilde, Computational Mechanics Publ., Southampton, UK, 1996, p. 153.
32. 32. Ishai, O., Failure of unidirectional composites in tension. J. Eng. Mech. Div., Proc. of the ASCE, 1971, 97(EM92), 205-221.
33. 33. Hashin, Z. and Rotem, A., A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. J. Compos. Mater., 1973, 7, 448.