Continuous Time Matching Constraints for Image Streams

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 85-96

  Åström, Kalle ^a   Heyden, Anders ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Calibrated camera; Motion; Multilinear constraint; Optical flow; Structure; Uncalibrated

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; CAMERAS; COMPUTER VISION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; OPTICAL FLOWS; OBJECT RECOGNITION;

CALIBRATED CAMERAS; MOTION; MULTILINEAR CONSTRAINTS; STRUCTURE; UNCALIBRATED CAMERAS; MULTILINEAR CONSTRAINT;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0032096689     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008006815607     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Åström, K. 1993. Automatic mapmaking. In Selected Papers from the 1st IFAC International Workshop on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles, D. Charnley (Ed.), Pergamon Press: Southampton, UK, pp. 181-186.
2. Åström, K., Cipolla, R., and Giblin, P.J. 1996. Generalised epipolar constraints. In Proc. 4th European Conf. on Computer Vision, Cambridge, UK, pp. 97-108.
3. Åström, K. and Heyden, A. 1996. Multilinear forms in the velocity case. In Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Fransisco, CA, USA, pp. 833-838.
4. Blom, J. 1992. Topological and geometrical aspects of image structure. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Medical and Physiological Physics, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
5. Faugeras, O.D. 1992. What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig? In Proc. 2nd European Conf. on Computer Vision, G. Sandini (Ed.), Springer: Verlag, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, pp. 563-578.
6. Faugeras, O. 1993. Three-Dimensional Computer Vision. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
7. Faugeras, O. and Mourrain, B. 1995. On the geometry and algebra of the point and line correspon between n imagesdences. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, MIT: Boston, MA, pp. 951-956.
8. Heyden, A. 1995. Reconstruction from image sequences by means of relative depths. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, MIT: Boston, MA, pp. 1058-1063.
9. Heyden, A. and Åström, K. 1995. A canonical framework for sequences of images. In Proc. IEEE workshop on Representation of Visual Scenes, MIT: Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 45-52.
10. Heyden, A. and Åström, K. 1997. Simplifications of multilinear forms for sequences of images. Image and Vision Computing, 15:749-757.
11. Longuet-Higgins, H.C. 1981. A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature, 293:133-135.
12. Luong, Q. and Vieville, T. 1994. Canonic representations for the geometries of multiple projective views. In Proc. 3rd European Conf. on Computer Vision, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 589-599.
13. Shashua, A. and Navab, N. 1996. Relative affine structure: Canonical model for 3D from 2D geometry and applications. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 18(9):873-883.
14. Sparr, G. 1994. A common framework for kinetic depth, reconstruction and motion for deformable objects. In Proc. 3rd European Conf. on Computer Vision, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 471-482.
15. Stefanovic, P. 1973. Relative orientation: A new appraoch. ITC Journal, 3:417-448.
16. Triggs, B. 1995. Matching constraints and the joint image. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, MIT: Boston, MA, pp. 338-343.
17. Vieville, T. and Faugeras, O.D. 1995. Motion analysis with a camera with unknown and possibly varying intrinsic parameters. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, MIT: Boston, MA, pp. 750-756.