Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 527-534

  Kingma, Idsart ^a   Van Dieën, Jaap H ^a   Looze, Michiel de ^a   Toussaint, Huub M ^a   Dolan, Patricia ^b   Baten, Chris T M ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c ROESSINGH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3 D analysis; Biomechanics; Lifting; Low back

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ASYMMETRIC LIFTING; LOW BACK; PELVIC TWIST;

BIOMECHANICS;

ARTICLE; BACK; BIOMECHANICS; BODY MOVEMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PELVIS; PHYSICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TORQUE; WEIGHT BEARING; WEIGHT LIFTING;

BACK; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; MOVEMENT; PELVIS; ROTATION; WEIGHT LIFTING;

EID: 0032096458     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00045-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bell A.L., Pedersen D.R., Brand R.A. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. Journal of Biomechanics. 23:1990;617-621.
2. Berme N., Capozzo A., Meglan J. Rigid Body Mechanics as Applied to Human Movement Studies. Berme N., Capozzo A. Biomechanics of Human Movement. Applications in Rehabilitation, Sports and Ergonomics:1990;89-107 Bertec, Worthington, OH.
3. Bush-Joseph C., Schipplein O., Andersson G.B.J., Andriacchi T.P. Influence of dynamic factors on the lumbar spine moment in lifting. Ergonomics. 31:1988;211-216.
4. Dempster W.T., Gaughran R.L. Properties of body segments based on size and weight. American Journal of Anatomy. 120:1967;33-54.
5. Dolan P., Earley M., Adams M.A. Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. Journal of Biomechanics. 27:1994;1237-1248.
6. Gagnon D., Gagnon M. The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering. Journal of Biomechanics. 25:1992;891-901.
7. Granata K.P., Marras W.S. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. Journal of Biomechanics. 28:1995;1309-1317.
8. Kelsey J.L., Githens P.B., White A.A., Holford T.R., Walter S.D., O'Connor T., Ostfeld A.M., Weil U., Southwick W.O., Calogero J.A. An epidemiological study of listing and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2:1984;61-66.
9. Kingma I., Looze M.P., de, Toussaint H.M., Klijnsma J.G., Bruijnen T.B.M. Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model. Human Movement Science. 15:1996;833-860.
10. Kurosawa H., Walker P.S., Garg A., Hunter T. Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. Journal of Biomechanics. 18:1985;487-499.
11. Looze M.P., Bussmann J.B.J., Kingma I., Toussaint H.M. Validation of a dynamic linked segment model to calculate joint movements in lifting. Clinical Biomechanics. 7:1992;161-169.
12. Looze M.P., de, Kingma I., Thunissen W., Wijk M.J., van, Toussaint H.M. The evaluation of a practical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities. Ergonomics. 37:1994;1495-1502.
13. Lundberg A., Svenson O.K., Nemeth G., Selvik G. The axis of rotation of the ankle joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 71-B:1989;95-99.
14. Marras W.S., Mirka G.A. A comprehensive evaluation of trunk response to a symmetric trunk motion. Spine. 17:1992;318-326.
15. Marras W.S., Sommerich C.M. A three-dimensional motion model of loads on the lumbar spine. I. model structure Human Factors. 33:1991;123-137.
16. Marras W.S.M, Lavender S.A., Leurgans S.E., Fathallah F.A., Ferguson S.A., Allread W.G., Rajulu S.L. Biomechanical risk factors for occupational related low back disorders. Ergonomics. 38:1995;377-410.
17. McConville, J.T., Churchill, T.D., Kaleps, I., Clauser, C.E., Cuzzi, J. 1980. Anthropometric relationships of body and body segment moments of inertia. Air force aerospace medical research laboratory, Wright-Patterson air force base, Ohio, AFAMRL-TR-80-119.
18. McGill S.M., Hoodless K. Measured and modelled static and dynamic axial trunk torsion during twisting in males and females. Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 12:1990;403-409.
19. McGill S.M., Norman R.W. Partitioning of the L4-L5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous, and muscular components during lifting. Spine. 7:1986;666-678.
20. Parnianpour M., Nordin M., Kahanovitz N., Frankel V. 1988 Volvo award in biomechanics. The triaxial coupling of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometric exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertial movements on the motor output and movement patterns. Spine. 13:1988;982-992.
21. 1 joint during asymmetrical lifting. effects of different load trajectories and initial load positions Clinical Biomechanics. 10:1995;128-136.
22. Ueno K. A three-dimensional finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion. Journal of Biomechanics. 109:1987;200-209.
23. Veldpaus F.E., Woltring H.J., Dortmans, L J.M.G. A least squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker coordinates. Journal of Biomechanics. 21:1988;45-54.
24. Waters T.R., Putz-Anderson V., Garg A., Fine L.J. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics. 36:1993;749-776.