Optimizing similarity using multi-query relevance feedback

Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 742-761

  Bartell, Brian T ^a   Cottrell, Garrison W ^b   Belew, Richard K ^b  

^a Conceptual Dimensions Inc ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SEARCHING; OPTIMIZATION; QUERY LANGUAGES;

MULTI-QUERY RELEVANCE FEEDBACK; RANKED OUTPUT TEXT RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0032094710     PISSN: 00028231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199806)49:8<742::aid-asi8>3.0.co;2-h     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bartell, B. T. (1994). Optimizing ranking functions: A connectionist approach to adaptive information retrieval. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, The University of California, San Diego.
2. Bartell, B. T., Cottrell, G. W., & Belew, R. K. (1992). Latent semantic indexing is an optimal special case of multidimensional scaling. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Copenhagen.
3. Bartell, B. T., Cottrell, G. W., & Belew, R. K. (1995). Representing documents using an explicit model of their similarities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 254-271.
4. Belew, R. (1989). Adaptive information retrieval: Using a connectionist representation to retrieve and learn about documents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Cambridge, MA (pp. 11-20).
5. Belew, R. K. (1986). Adaptive information retrieval: Machine learning in associative networks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
6. Belkin, N. J., Cool, C., Croft, W. B., & Callan, J. P. (1993). Effect of multiple query representations on information retrieval system performance. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 339-346).
7. Bookstein, A., & Swanson, D. R. (1974). Probabilistic models for automatic indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 25, 312-318.
8. Borg, I., & Lingoes, J. (1987), Multidimensional similarity structure analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Brauen, T. L. (1971). Document vector modification. In The smart retrieval system - Experiments in automatic document processing (pp. 456-484). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Cormen, T. H., Lieserson, C. E., & Rivest, R. L. (1992). Introduction to algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Crestani, F. (1993). Learning strategies for an adaptive information retrieval system using neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international Conference on Neural Networks, San Francisco, CA.
12. Cutting, D. R., Pedersen, J. O., Karger, D. R., & Tukey, J. W. (1992). Scatter/gather: A cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Copenhagen (pp. 318-329).
13. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391-407.
14. Dumais, S. T. (1990). Enhancing performance in latent semantic indexing (LSI) retrieval (Tech. Rep. Tech. Memorandum). Bellcore.
15. Frants, V. I., Shapiro, J., & Voiskunskii, V. G. (1993). Multiversion information retrieval systems and feedback with mechanism of selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 19-27.
16. Fuhr, N., & Buckley, C. (1991). A probabilistic learning approach for document indexing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9(3), 223-248.
17. Fuhr, N., & Buckley, C. (1993). Optimizing document indexing and search term weighting based on probabilistic models. In D. K. Harman (Eds.), The first Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-1). NIST Special Publication 500-207.
18. Furnas, G. W., Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Harshman, R. A., Streeter, L. A., & Lochbaum, K. E. (1988). Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Grenoble, France.
19. Gordon, M. (1988). Probabilistic and genetic algorithms in document retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 31 (10).
20. Guttman, L. (1978). What is not what in statistics. The Statistician, 26, 81-107.
21. Harman, D. (1986). An experimental study of factors important in document ranking. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Pisa, Italy (pp. 186-193).
22. Harman, D. (1993). Overview of the first Text REtrieval Conference. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 36-48).
23. Holland, J. (1976). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
24. Ide, E. (1971). New experiments in relevance feedback. In The smart system - Experiments in automatic document processing, (pp. 337-354). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Jones, W. P., & Furnas, G. W. (1987). Pictures of relevance: A geometric analysis of similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38, 420-442.
26. Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1), 1-27.
27. McGill, M., Koll, M., & Noreault, T. (1979). An evaluation of factors affecting document ranking by information retrieval systems (Tech. Rep.). Syracuse, NY: School of Information Studies, Syracuse University.
28. Mozer, M. C. (1984). Inductive information retrieval using parallel distributed computation (Tech. Rep. TR8406). La Jolla, CA: Institute for Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.
29. Olafsen, T., & Vokac, L. (1982). Optimal values of recall and precision. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 92-96.
30. Plutowski, M., Sakata, S., & White, H. (1993). Cross-validation estimates imse. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 1993, Vail, CO.
31. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling, W. T. (1988). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press.
32. Raghavan, V. V.,& Wong, S. K. M. (1986). A critical analysis of vector space model for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 279-287.
33. Raveh, A. (1989). A nonmetric approach to linear discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(405), 176-183.
34. Rocchio, J. J., Jr. (1971). Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The smart system - Experiments in automatic document processing (pp. 337-354). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Rose, D. E. (1991). A symbolic and connectionist approach to legal information retrieval. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science and Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.
36. Rose, D. E., Mander, R., Oren, T., Ponceleon, D. B., Salomon, G., & Wong, Y. Y. (1993). Content awareness in a file system interface: Implementing the 'Pile' metaphor for organizing information. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 260-269).
37. Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principle of neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms. Washington, DC: Spartan Books.
38. Ross, K. A., & Wright, C. R. B. (1988). Discrete mathematics (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39. Salton, G. (Ed.). (1971). The smart retrieval system - Experiments in automatic document processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Salton, G. (1980). Automatic term class construction using relevance - A summary of work in automatic pseudoclassification. Information Processing & Management, 16, 1-15.
41. Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 24(5), 513-523.
42. Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1990). Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 288-297.
43. Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Shepard, R. N. (1962). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. Psychometrika, 27(2), 125-139.
45. Sietsma, J., & Dow, R. J. F. (1988). Neural net pruning - Why and how. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Neural Networks: Vol. 1, San Diego, CA. (pp. 325-333).
46. Valiant, L. G. (1984). Theory of the learnable. Communications of the ACM, 27(11), 1134-1142.
47. van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1983). Information retrieval (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.
48. Wong, S. K. M., Cai, Y. J., & Yao, Y. Y. (1993). Computation of term associations by a neural network. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, Pittsburgh, PA.
49. Wong, S. K. M., & Yao, Y. Y. (1990). Query formulation in linear retrieval models. Journal of the American Society for Information Retrieval, 41, 334-341.