Approximate solutions to unreachable commands in teleoperation of a robot

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 219-227

  Schinstock, D E ^a  

^a University of Alabama   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CONTROL; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); INVERSE KINEMATICS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; REMOTE CONTROL; VECTORS;

DYNAMIC WEIGHTING; DYNAMIC WEIGHTING MATRICES; INVERSE JACOBIAN PROBLEM; TASK SPACE CONTROLLER;

MANIPULATORS;

EID: 0032094204     PISSN: 07365845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-5845(97)00033-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Jansen JF, Kress RL, Babcock SM, Controller design for a force-reflecting teleoperator system with kinematically dissimilar master and slave. ASME J Dyn Systems Measurement, Control 1992;114:641-9.
2. Harrison FW, Soloway D, Williams RL, Hogge EF. Natural transition from rate to force control of a manipulator, AIAA Space Programs and Technologies Conf., March, Huntsville, AL, 1992.
3. Brooks TL. Telerobotic response requirements. Proc. IEEE Int Conf on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1990:113-120.
4. Dubey R, Luh JYS. Redundant robot control for higher flexibility. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1987:1066-72.
5. Klein CA, Huang CS. Reveiw of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernet 1983;13:245-50.
6. Ligeois. Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behaviour of multibody mechanisms. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernet, 1997;7:868-71.
7. Yoshikawa T. Analysis and control of robot manipulators with redundancy. Proc 1st Int Symp on Robotics Research, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984:735-47.
8. Whitney DE. Resolved motion rate control of manipulators and human prostheses. IEEE Trans Man-Machine Systems 1969; MMC-10:47-53.
9. Chan SK, Lawrence PD. General inverse kinematics with the error damped pseudoinverse. Proc. IEEE Int Conf on Robotics and Automation, 1988:834-9.
10. Kelmar L, Kholsa PK. Automatic generation of forward and inverse kinematics for a reconfigurable modular manipulator system. J Robotic Systems 1990;7:599-619.
11. Mayorga RV, Milano N, Wong AKC. A fast procedure for manipulator inverse kinematics computation and singularities prevention. J Robotic Systems 1993;10(1):45-72.
12. Nakamura Y, Hanafusa H. Inverse kinematic solutions with singularity robustness for robot manipulator control. ASME J Dyn Systems Measurement Control 1986;108:163-71.
13. Wampler CW. Manipulator inverse kinematic solutions based on vector formulations and damped least-squares methods. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernet 1986;SMC-16(1):93-101.
14. Chan TG, Dubey RF. A weighted least-norm solution based scheme for avoiding joint limits for redundant joint manipulators. IEEE Trans Robotics Automat 1995;11(2):286-92.
15. Lipkin H, Pohl E. Enumeration of singular configurations for robotic manipulators. ASME J Mech Des 1991;113:272-9.
16. Levenberg K. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quart J Appl Math 1994; 2:164-8.
17. Schinstock DE, Faddis TN, Greenway RB. Robust inverse kinematics using damped least squares with dynamic weighting. Proc. AIAA/NASA Conf. on Intelligent Robots in Field, Factory, Service, and Space (CIRFFSS '94), 1994;II:861-9.