A knowledge-based system integrated with numerical analysis tools for aircraft life-cycle design

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 211-229

  Marx, William J ^a   Mavris, Dimitri N ^b   Schrage, Daniel P ^b  

^a BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Aircraft Design; High speed Civil Transport; Knowledge based System; Life cycle Cost

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE INDUSTRY; AIRCRAFT; COSTS; DESIGN; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

LIFE CYCLE;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 0032093869     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0890060498123016     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Apgar, H. (1993). Design-to-life-cycle-cost in aerospace. AIAA-93-1181. Proc. AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aerospace Design Conf. pp. Irvine, California.
2. Bhatia, K.G., & Wertheimer, J (1993). Aeroelastic challenges for a high speed civil transport. AIAA-93-1478. Proc. 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf. pp. 3661-3682. La Jolla, California.
3. Bobick, J.C., Braun, R.L., & Denny, R.E. (1979). Documentation of the analysis of the benefits and costs of aeronautical research and technology models - Vol. 1. Technical Report. NASA-CR-152278.
4. Brunner, M., & Velicki, A. (1993) Study of materials and structures for high speed civil transports. NASA-CR-191434, McDonnell Douglas Aerospace.
5. Carlson, H.W., & Walkley, K.B. (1984). Numerical methods and a computer program for subsonic and supersonic aerodynamic design and analysis of wings with attainable thrust considerations. NASA-CR- 3808.
6. Dix, D.M., & Riddell, F.R. (1976). Projecting cost-performance trade-offs for military vehicles. Astronautics & Aeronautics September, 40-50.
7. Feigenbaum, E.A. (1980). Knowledge engineering: The applied side of artificial intelligence. Report STAN-CS-80-812, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
8. Fisher, D.C. (1989). Design and analysis aid for evaluating aircraft structures. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Vol 1, pp. 469-472. Tullahoma, Tennessee.
9. Gaines, B R. (1988). Structure, development, and applications of expert systems in integrated manufacturing. In Artificial Intelligence: Implications for CIM, (Kusiak, A , Ed.), Chapter 4. Spriger-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
10. Gaynor, G H. (1993). Exploiting product cycle time: Integrating technologies, products, and markets. EMR Spring, 30-43.
11. Giarratano, J., & Riley, G. (1994). Expert Systems: Principles and Programming. PWS Publishing Company, Boston, Massachusetts.
12. Gopalakrishnan, B., & Pandiarajan, V. (1991). Materials and manufacturing processes selection system for product designs in concurrent engineering. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 28, 93-103.
13. Harris, R.V., Jr. (1964). An analysis and correlation of aircraft wave drag. NASA TMX-947.
14. Hatekeyama, S.J. (1995). Wing structures development for the HSCT. Aerospace Engineering May, 25-29.
15. Jensen, R.N , & Mijares, R.D. (1975). Mass analysis. Section 15, substantiating data for arrow-wing supersonic cruise aircraft structural design concepts evaluation. NASA-CR-132575-4.
16. King, N E. (1992). Heuristics as a design tool for brilliant eyes cost engineering. AIAA-92-1055. Proc. AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aerospace Design Conf. Irvine, California
17. Lee, P. (1993). A process oriented parametric cost model. AIAA-93-1029. Proc. AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aerospace Design Conf. Irvine, California.
18. Mabson, G.E., Flynn, B.W, Ilcewicz, L.B., & Graesser, D.L. (1994). The use of COSTADE in developing composite commercial aircraft fuselage structures. AIAA-94-1492 Proc. 35th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., pp. 1384- 1393. Hilton Head, South Carolina.
19. Markus, A. (1991). Resin transfer molding for advanced composite primary wing and fuselage structures. Proc. 2nd NASA ACT Conf., pp. 145- 167. Lake Tahoe, Nevada.
20. Markus, A., Thrash, P., & Rohwer, K. (1992). Progress in manufacturing large primary aircraft structures using the stitching/RTM process. Proc. Third NASA ACT Conf., pp. 453-479. Long Beach, California.
21. st AIAA Aircraft Engineering, Technology, and Operations Congress, pp. Los Angeles, California.
22. Marx, W.J. (1996). Integrating design and manufacturing for the high speed civil transport. PhD Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
23. McCullers, L.A. (1992). AWAVE: User's guide for the revised wave drag analysis program. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA.
24. McCullers, L.A. (1994). FLOPS: Flight optimization system. Release 5.7, user's guide. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA.
25. Meisl, C.J. (1992). The future of design integrated cost modeling. AIAA- 92-1056 Proc. AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aerospace Design Conf., pp. Irvine. California.
26. Messimer, S.L., & Henshaw, J. (1994). Composites design and manufacturing assistant. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology 9(1/2/3), 105-115.
27. Metschan, S.L., Wilden, K.S., Sharpless, G.C., & Andelman, R.M. (1992). Cost model relationships between textile manufacturing processes and design details for transport fuselage elements. Proc. Third NASA ACT Conf, pp. 323-340. Long Beach, California.
28. Middleton, W.D., & Lundry, J.L. (1980a) A system for aerodynamic design and analysis of supersonic aircraft. Part 1 - General description and theoretical development. NASA CR-3351.
29. Middleton, W.D., & Lundry, J.L. (1980b). A system for aerodynamic design and analysis of supersonic aircraft. Part 4 - Test cases. NASA CR-3354.
30. Middleton, W.D., Lundry, J.L., & Coleman, R.G. (1980a). A system for aerodynamic design and analysis of supersonic aircraft. Part 2 - User's manual. NASA CR-3352.
31. Middleton, W.D., Lundry, J.L., & Coleman, R.G. (1980b). A system for aerodynamic design and analysis of supersonic aircraft. Part 3 - Computer program description. NASA CR-3353.
32. NASA (1989a). High-speed civil transport study. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. New Airplane Development, pp. 97-109. NASA CR-4233.
33. NASA (1989b). Study of high-speed civil transports. Douglas Aircraft Company. New Commercial Programs, pp. 123-137. NASA CR-4235.
34. Noble, J.S., & Tanchoco, J.M.A. (1990). Concurrent design and economic justification in developing a product. International Journal of Production Research 28(7) 1225-1238.
35. Noble, J.S., & Tanchoco, J.M.A. (1993). Design for Economics. In Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques, (Kusiak, A., Ed.), Chap. 16, pp. 401-461. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
36. NRC (1995). Information technology for manufacturing: A research agenda. National Research Council Report, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1995.
37. Pecora, D., Zumsteg, J.R., & Crossman, F.W. (1985). An application of expert systems to composite structural design and analysis. Proc. ASME Winter Annual meeting, pp. 135-147 Miami, Florida.
38. Rao, K.P., Viswanath, S., Sridhara Murthy, S., & Jayatheertha, C. (1990) An expert system approach for the design of composite laminates. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 70, 231-248.
39. Röhl, P.J. (1995). A multilevel decomposition procedure for the preliminary wing design of a high speed civil transport aircraft. PhD Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
40. Saggu, J.S. (1992). Integration of aircraft design and manufacture using artificial intelligence paradigms. ICAS-92-7.2.2. Proc. 18th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 1, pp. 372-380. Beijing, China.
41. Sakata, I.F (1975a). Production costs. Section 16, substantiating data for arrow-wing supersonic cruise aircraft structural design concepts evaluation. NASA-CR-132575-4.
42. Sakata, I.F. (1975b). Concept evaluation and selection. Section 17, substantiating data for arrow-wing supersonic cruise aircraft structural design concepts evaluation. NASA-CR-132575-4.
43. Sakata, I.F., & Davis, G.W. (1977). Evaluation of structural design concepts for an arrow-wing supersonic cruise aircraft. NASA-CR-2667.
44. Suarez, J., & Dastin, S. (1991). Comparison of resin film infusion, resin transfer molding, and consolidation of textile preforms for primary aircraft structure. Proc. 2nd NASA ACT Conf., pp. 381-386. Lake Tahoe, Nevada.
45. Thurston, D.L., & Carnahan, J.V. (1993). Intelligent Evaluation of Designs for Manufacturing Cost. Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques, (Kusiak, A., Ed.), Chapter 17. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
46. Tzong, G., Baker, M., Yalamanchili, K., & Geising, J. (1994). Aeroelastic loads and structural optimization of a high speed civil transport model. AIAA-94-4378. Proc. 5th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City Beach, Florida
47. Velicki, A. (1995). Materials and structures for the HSCT. Aerospace Engineering April, 17-19.
48. Warburton, L.M., & Glatfeltner, J.W. (1995). Development and utilization of a knowledge-based environment on a production helicopter program. Proc. AHS Vertical Lift Aircraft Design Conf., pp. 1.6-1-1.6-19. San Francisco, California.
49. Wright, B.R., & Ross, R.L. (1976). Technology assessment studies applied to supersonic cruise vehicles. NASA CR-145133.
50. Zumsteg, J.R., Pecora, D., & Pecora, V.J. (1985). A prototype expert system for the design and analysis of composite material structures. Proc. ASME Int. Computers in Engineering Conf., pp. 137-143. Boston, Massachusetts.