Fundamental changes in institutional governance structures: The United Kingdom

Higher Education Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 111-120

  Dearlove, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032091235     PISSN: 09528733     EISSN: 17403863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8733(98)00002-6     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ainley, P. (1994). Degrees of Difference: Higher Educalion in the 1990.5. London: Lawrence and Wishart
2. Association of University Teachers. (1995). Ethics in Educalion. Evidence to the Nolan Committee, London: AUT.
3. Bargh, C., Scott, P. and Smith, D. (1996). Governing Universities. Buckingham: SRHE./Open University Press.
4. Benveniste, G. (1987). Professionalising the Organisation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Berdahl, G. (1959). British Universities and the Slate. London: Cambridge University Press.
6. Berdahl, R. O. (1990). Act.demic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1). 169-80.
7. Blau, P. (1973). The Orgai isuiion of Academic Work. London: Wiley.
8. Caine, S. (1969). British Universities: Purpose and Prospect. London: Bodley Head.
9. Committee on Standards in Public Life. (1996). Local Public Spending Bodies, Cm 3270-1. London: HMSO
10. Committee of University Chairmen. (1995). Guide for Members of Governing Bodies of Universities and Colleges in England and Wales, M 11, 95. Bristol: HEFCE.
11. Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals. (1995). Standards in Public Life: Local Spending Bodies, N,95,/203. London: CVCP.
12. Department of Education and Science. (1966). A Plan for Polytechnics and Other Colleges. London: HMSO.
13. Department of Education and Science. (1989). The English Polytechnics: An HMI Commentary, London: HMSO.
14. Eustace, R. (1987). The English ideal of university governance: A missing rationale and some implications. Studies in Higher Education, 12(1). 7-22.
15. Eustace, R. (1994). University autonomy: The '80s and after. Higher Educalion Quarterly, 48. 86-117.
16. Farrington, D. J. (1994). The Law of Higher Education. London: Butterworths.
17. Ferns, H. S. (1982). How Much Freedom for Universities? London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
18. Friedson, E. (1994) Professionalism Reborn. London: Polity.
19. The Governance of Public Bodies: A Progress Report (1997). Cm 3557, London: HMSO.
20. Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of Donnish Dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21. Halsey, A. H. and Tiow, M. (1971). The British Academics. London: Faber and Faber.
22. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (1995). Standards in Public Life: Higher Education Institutions. Bristol: HEFCE.
23. Jarratt Report. (1985). Steering committee for efficiency studies in universities under the chairmanship of Alex Jarratt. Report. London: CVCP.
24. Kogan, M. (1989). Managerialism in higher education, in D. Lawton (Ed), The Education Reform Act: Choice and Control. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
25. Kogan, M. and Kogan, D. (1983). The Attack on Higher Education. London: Kogan-Page.
26. Lieil, P. (1985). The Law of Education (9th. ed.). Special Bulletin, Education Reform Act 1988. London: Buttertvorths.
27. Locke, M. (1974). Cfovernment. In J. Pratt and T. Burgess (Ed.), Polytechnics: A Report. London: Pitman.
28. McNay, I. (1995). From collegial academy to corporate enterprise: The changing cultures in universities, in T. Schuller (Ed.), The Changing University. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press, pp. 105-15.
29. Miller, H. (1995). The Management of Change in Universities. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
30. Moodie, G. (1976). Authority, charters and the survival of academic rule. Studies in Higher Education. 1(2), 127-35.
31. Moodie, G. (1983). Buffer, Coupling and Broker: Reflections on 60 years of the VGC. Higher Education. 72, 331-47.
32. Moodie, G. and Eustace, R. (1974). Power and Authority in British Universities. London: Allen and Unwin.
33. National Advisory Body. (1987). Management for a purpose. The report of the Good Management Practice Group. London: NAB.
34. National Associaticin for Teachers in Further and Higher Education. (1995). Evidence to the Nolan committee, and Opening Up the Institutions. London: NATFHE.
35. Oakes Report. (1978). Report of the Working Group on The Management of Higher Education in the Maintained Sector. Cmnd 7130. London: HMSO.
36. Pratt, J. (1997). The Polytechnic Experiment. London: Oxford University Press.
37. Robbins Report. (1963). Committee on Higher Education, Report. Cmnd 2154, London: HMSO.
38. Robinson, E. E. (1958). The New Polytechnics. London: Cornmarket.
39. Russell, C. (1993). Academic Freedom. London: Routledge.
40. Scott, P. (1995). The Meanings of Mass Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
41. Scott, P. and Watson, D. (1994). Managing the curriculum: Roles and responsibilities. In J. Bocock and D. Watson (Ed.). Managing the University Curriculum. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press, pp. 33-47.
42. Shattock, M. (1994). I'he UGC and the Management of British Universities. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
43. Sizer, J. (1987). An Analysis of Institutions’ Responses to Constitutional Recommendations in the Jarratt Report. London: UGC'.
44. Smyth, J. (1995). Academic Work. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
45. Tapper, T. and Salter, B. (1995). The changing idea of university autonomy. Studies in Higher Education. 29(1), 59-71.
46. Tight, M. (1996). University typologies re-examined. Higher Education Review, 29, 57-77.
47. Trow, M. (1984). Managerialism and the Academic Profession: Quality and Control. London: Quality Support Centre.
48. University Grants Committee. (1984). A Strategy for Higher Education into the 1990.V. London: UGC.
49. University Grants Committee. (1987). Report to the Secretary of State on Universities’ Responses to the Jarratt Report. London: UGC.
50. Weaver Report. (1966). Report of the Study Group on The Government of Colleges of Education London' HMSO.