Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 233-238

  Ueda, Hiroshi M ^a   Ishizuka, Yasuo ^a   Miyamoto, Keisuke ^a   Morimoto, Noriaki ^a   Tanne, Kazuo ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Craniofacial morphology; Digastric muscle; Electromyogram; Masticatory muscle

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FACIAL BONE; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MASSETER MUSCLE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; NECK MUSCLE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; TEMPORALIS MUSCLE; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASSETER MUSCLE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; NECK MUSCLES; REFERENCE VALUES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TEMPORAL MUSCLE; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0032088977     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Moss ML, Salentijn L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod 1969;55:566-577.
2. Ringqvist M. Isometric bite force and its relation to dimensions of the facial skeleton. Acta Odont Scand 1973;31:35-42.
3. Fogle LL, Glaros AG. Contributions of facial morphology, age and gender to EMG activity under biting and resting conditions. J Dent Res 1995;74:1496-1500.
4. Moller E. The chewing apparatus: An electromyographic study of the action of the muscles of mastication and its correlation to facial morphology. Acta Physiol Scand 1966;69:Suppl.280.
5. Miralles R, Hevia R, Contreras L, Carvajal R, Bull R, Manns A. Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types. Angle Orthod 1991;61:277-284.
6. Wessberg GA, Washburn MC, Epker BN, Dana KO. Evaluation of mandibular rest position in subjects with diverse dentofacial morphology. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:451-460.
7. Lowe AA. Correlations between orofacial muscle activity and craniofacial morphology in a sample of control and anterior open-bite subjects. Am J Orthod 1980;78:89-98.
8. Peterson TM, Rugh JD, McIver JE. Mandibular rest position in subjects with high and low mandibular plane angles. Am J Orthod 1983; 83:318-320.
9. Miyamoto K, Yamada K, Ishizuka Y, Tanne K. Masseter muscle activity during whole day in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110:394-398.
10. Clark GT, Beemsterboer DL, Rugh JD. Nocturnal masseter muscle activity and the symptoms of masticatory dysfunction. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:279-286.
11. Rugh JD, Barghi N, Drago CJ. Experimental occlusal discrepancies and noctural bruxism. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:548-553.
12. Miyamoto K, Ishizuka Y, Tanne K. Changes in masseter muscle activity during orthodontic treatment evaluated by a 24-hour EMG system. Angle Orthod 1996;66:223-228.
13. Yamada K, Sunouchi Y, Watanabe Y, Ishida M, Miyamoto K, Tsai CY, et al. 24 hours masticatory muscle EMG. J Hiroshima Univ Dent Soc 1993;25:332-336.
14. Van Eijden TMGJ. Jaw muscle activity in relation to the direction and point of application of bite force. J Dent Res 1990;69:901-905.
15. Visser A, McCarroll RS, Naeije M. Masticatory muscle activity in different jaw relations during submaximal clenching efforts. J Dent Res 1992;71:372-379.
16. Lindauer SJ, Gay T, Rendell J. Effect of jaw opening on masticatory muscle EMG-force characteristics. J Dent Res 1993;72:51-55.
17. Throckmorton GS, Dean JS. The relationship between jaw-muscle mechanical advantage and activity levels during isometric bites in humans. Archs Oral Biol 1994;39:429-437.
18. Blanksma NG, Van Eijden TMGJ. Electromyographic heterogeneity in the human temporalis and masseter muscles during static biting, openclose excursions, and chewing. J Dent Res 1995;74:1318-1327.
19. Bakke M. Mandibular elevator muscles: Physiology, action and effect of dental occlusion. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:314-331.
20. Latif A. An electromyographic study of the temporalis muscle in normal persons during selected positions and movements of the mandible. Am J Orthod 1957; 43:577-591.
21. Munro RR. Coordination of activity of the two bellies of the digastric muscle in basic jaw movements. J Dent Res 1972;51:1663-1665.
22. Ahlgren J. Mechanism of mastication. Acta Odont Scand 1966;24 suppl.44.
23. Ingervall B, Thilander B. Relation between facial morphology and activity of the masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabil 1974;1:131-147.
24. Takada K, Lowe AA, Freund VK. Canonical correlations between masticatory muscle orientation and dentoskeletal morphology in children. Am J Orthod 1984;86:331-341.
25. Kiliaridis S, Kalebo P. Masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and its relation to facial morphology. J Dent Res 1991;70:1262-1265.
26. Bakke M, Tuxen A, Vilmann P, Jensen BR, Vilmann A, Toft M. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:164-171.
27. Weijs WA, Hillen B. Relationship between masticatory muscle cross-section and skull shape. J Dent Res 1984;63:1154-1157.
28. Ahlgren J, Sonesson B, Blitz M. An electromyographic analysis of the temporalis function of normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1985; 87:230-239.
29. Ingervall B. Facial morphology and activity of temporal and lip muscles during swallowing and chewing. Angle Orthod 1976;46:372-380.
30. Sharkey P, Boyle DK, Orchardson R, McGowan DA. Jaw opening forces in human subjects. Br Dent J 1984;156:89-92.
31. Van Spronsen PH, Weijis WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel FC. Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and craniofacial morphology in normal adults, studied with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:351-361.