A family systems approach for preventing adolescent runaway behavior

Adolescence

Volumn 33, Issue 130, 1998, Pages 485-496

  Coco, E Lane ^a   Courtney, Linda J ^a  

^a DePelchin Children's Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; EGO DEVELOPMENT; FAMILY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALIZATION; MALE; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK FACTOR; RUNAWAY BEHAVIOR; SYSTEMS THEORY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD OF IMPAIRED PARENTS; FAMILY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUATION; MALE; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT; RISK FACTORS; RUNAWAY BEHAVIOR; SYSTEMS THEORY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032088660     PISSN: 00018449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barth, R. P. (1986). Social and cognitive treatment of children and adolescents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (1995). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (2nd ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Cohen, E., Mackenzie, R. G., & Yates, G. L. (1991). HEADS, a psychosocial risk assessment instrument: Implications for designing effective intervention programs for runaway youth. Journal of Adolescent Medicine, 12, 539-544.
4. Crespi, T. D., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1993). Adolescent runaways and family strife: A conflict-induced differentiation framework. Adolescence, 28, 867-878.
5. Feitel, B., Margetson, N., Chamas, J., & Lipman, C. (1992). Psychosocial background and behavioral and emotional disorders of homeless and runaway youth. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 155-159.
6. Flores, M. T., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1989). Can therapists use FACES III with Mexican Americans? A preliminary analysis. In D. H. Olson, C. S. Russell, & D. H. Sprenkle (Eds.), Circumplex model: Systemic assessment and treatment of families. New York: Haworth Press.
7. General Accounting Office. (1989). Homelessness: Homeless and runaway youth receiving services at federally funded shelters (GAO Publication No. HRD-90-45). Washington, D.C: Author
8. Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1991) Family therapy: An overview. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9. Green, R. G. (1989). Choosing family measurement devices for practice and research: SFI and FACES III. Social Service Review, June, 304-320.
10. Greene, N. B., & Esselstyn, T. C. (1972). The beyond-control girl. Juvenile Justice, 23, 13-19.
11. Guerin, P. J., & Pendagast, E. G. (1976). Evaluation of family system and genogram. In P. J. Guerin, Jr. (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice. New York: Gardner Press.
12. Homer, L. E. (1973). Community-based resource for runaway girls. Social Casework, 54, 473-479.
13. Kurtz, P. D., Jarvis, S. V., & Kurtz, G. L. (1991). Problems of homeless youths: Empirical findings and human services issues. Social Work, 36, 311-314.
14. L'Abate, L., & Colondier, G. (1987). The emperor has no clothes! Long live the emperor! A critique of family systems thinking and a reductionistic proposal. American Journal of Family Therapy, 15, 19-33.
15. Lappin, J., & Covelman, D. W. (1985). Adolescent runaways: A structural family therapy perspective. In M. P. Mirkin & S. L. Koman (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent and family therapy. New York: Gardner Press.
16. Mirkin, M. P., Raskin, P. A., & Antognini, F. C. (1984). Parenting, protecting, preserving: Mission of the adolescent female runaway. Family Process, 23, 63-74.
17. National Network of Runaway and Youth Services. (1985). To whom do they belong? A profile of America's runaways and homeless youth and the programs that help them. Washington, D.C: Author.
18. Olson, D. H. (1989). Circumplex model of family systems: FACES III. Family assessment and intervention. In D. H. Olson, C. S. Russell, & D. H. Sprenkle (Eds.), Circumplex model: Systemic assessment and treatment of families New York: Haworth Press.
19. Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex model VI: Theoretical update. Family Process, 22, 69-83.
20. Olson, D. H., & Wilson, M. (1982). Family satisfaction. In D. Olson et al. (Eds.), Family inventories. St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
21. Pratt, D. M., & Hansen, J. C. (1987). A test of the curvilinear hypothesis with FACES II and III. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 387-392.
22. Rodick, J. D., Henggeler, S. W., & Hanson, C. L. (1986). An evaluation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales and the Circumplex model. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 77-87.
23. Searight, H. R., & Merkel, W. T. (1991). Systems theory and its discontents: Clinical and ethical issues. American Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 19-31.
24. Sharlin, S. A., & Mor-Barak, M. (1992). Runaway girls in distress: Motivation, background, and personality. Adolescence, 27, 387-405.
25. Schwartzman, J., & Restivo, R. J. (1985). Acting out and staying in: Juvenile probation and the family. In J. Schwartzman (Ed.), Families and other systems: The macrosystemic context of family therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
26. Speck, N. B., Ginther, D. W., & Helton, J. R. (1988). Runaways: Who will run away again? Adolescence, 23, 881-888.
27. Zide, M. R., & Cherry, A. L. (1992). A typology of runaway youths: An empirically based definition. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 9, 155-168.