Students' misconceptions about perceived physiological responses

American Journal of Physiology

Volumn 274, Issue 6 PART 2, 1998, Pages

  Michael, Joel A ^a  

^a RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Mental models; Misconceptions; Respirator' physiology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREATHING; EDUCATION; EGO; FEMALE; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; CARDIAC OUTPUT; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT PROJECTS; REALITY TESTING; RESPIRATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 0032087628     PISSN: 00029513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advances.1998.274.6.s90     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arnaudin, M. W., and J. J. Mintzes. Students' alternative conceptions of the human circulator)- system: a cross-age study. Sei. Ecluc. 69: 721 -733, 1985.
2. Barrows, II. S., and R. M. Tamblyn. Problem-Based Learning: An Application to Medical Education. New York: Springer, 1980.
3. Brna, P. Confronting misconceptions in the domain of simple electrical circuits. Instructional Sei. 17:29-55, 1988.
4. Browning, M., and J. Lehman. Identification of student misconceptions in genetics problem solving via computer program.J. Res. Sei. Teach. 25: 747-761, 1988.
5. Clement, J. A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students. In: Mental Models, edited by D. Centner and A. L. Stevens. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983, p. 325-340.
6. Cohen, R., B. Eylon, and U. Ganiel. Potential difference and current in simple electrical circuits: a study of students' concepts. Am.J.Pbys. 51:407-412, 1983.
7. Fcltovich, P. J., R. J. Spiro, and R. L. Coulson. The nature of conceptual understanding in biomedicine: the deep structure of complex ideas and the development of misconceptions. In: Cognitive Science in Medicine, edited by D. A. Evans and V. L. Patel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989, p. 113-172.
8. Gotterer, G., P. Blumberg, and II. Paul. The alternative preclinical curriculum. In: Innovative Tracks at Established Institutions for the Education of Health Personnel: An Experimental Approach Relevant to Health Needs, edited by M. Kantrowitz. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1987, p. 179-196 (Offset Publication No. 101).
9. Green, B. F., M. McCloskey, and A. Caramazza. The relation of knowledge to problem solving, with examples from kinematics. In: ninking and Learning: Research and Open Questions, edited by S. Chipman and J. W. Segal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1985, vol. 2, p. 127-139.
10. Griffiths, A. K., and K. R. Preston. Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules./ Res. Sd. Teach. 29:611-628, 1992.
11. Halloun, I. A., and D. Hestenes. The initial knowledge state of college physics students. Am.J.Pbys. 53: 1043-1055, 1985-
12. Halloun, I. A., and D. Hestenes. Common sense concepts about motion. Am.]-. Phys. 53: 1056-1065,1985.
13. Kindfield, A. C. II. Confusing chromosome number and structure: a common student error.J. Dial. Edite. 25: 193-200, 1991.
14. McCloskey, M., A. Caramazza, and B. Green. Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. Science 210: 1139-1141, 1980.
15. Mintzes, J. J., J. E. Trowbridge, and M. W. Arnaudln. Children's biology: studies on conceptual development in the life sciences. In: Tlje Psychology of Learning Science, edited by S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, and B. K. Britton. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991, p. 179-202.
16. Modell, II. I., and J. A. Michael (editors). Promoting active learning in the life science classroom. Ann. NYAcad. Sei. 701: 1-151,1993.
17. Nakhleh, M. B. Why some students don't learn chemistry: chemical misconceptions.J. Chein. Ednc. 69: 191-196, 1992.
18. Smith, J. P. HI, A. A. diSessa, and J. Roschelle. Misconceptions conceived: a constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition.J. Instructional Sei. 3:115-163,1993.
19. Stewart, J., R. Hafner, and M. Dale. Students' alternative views of meiosis.ylw. Biol. Teach. 52: 228-232, 1990.
20. Treagust, D. F. The development and use of diagnostic instruments to evaluate students' misconceptions in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA, 1989.
21. Veiga, M., D. Costa Peretra, and R. Maskill. Teachers' language and pupils' ideas in science lessons: can teachers avoid reinforcing wrong ideas? Int. J. Sei. Ednc. 11: 465-479, 1989.
22. Wandersee, J. II., J. A. Mintzes, andj. D. Novak. Research on alternative conceptions in science. In: Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, edited by D. L. Gabel. New York: Macmillan, 1994, p. 131-210.
23. White, B., and J. R. Frederiksen. Qualitative models and intelligent learning environments. In: Artificial Intelligence and Education, edited by R. W. Lawler and M. Yazdani. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1987, vol. 1, p. 281-305.