Pulp reaction to a tri-cure resin-modified glass ionomer

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 712-719

  Demirci, Mustafa ^a   Üçok, Mete ^a   Küçükkeleş, Nazan ^a,b   Soydan, Namik ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUGENOL; FORMALDEHYDE; GLASS IONOMER; N2 DENTAL CEMENT; RESIN; SILICATE CEMENT; VITREMER; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN, SECONDARY; DRUG COMBINATIONS; EUGENOL; FORMALDEHYDE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; SILICATE CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 0032086029     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90040-3     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Burgess J, Norling B, Summit J. Resin ionomer restorative materials: the new generation. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1994;6:207-15.
2. Mitra SB, Conway WT. Coefficient of thermal expansion of some methacrylate-modified glass ionomers [abstract]. J Dent Res 1994;73:219. Abstract 944.
3. Conn LJ, Lane LD, Duke ES. The effect of finishing technique on the color of hybrid glass ionomers [abstract]. J Dent Res 1994;73:329. Abstract 1821.
4. Doray P. Color stability of direct esthetic restorative materials. In: Hunt PR, editor. Glass ionomers - the next generation: proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on glass ionomers. Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC; 1994. p. 199-208.
5. Hondrum SO, Fernández R Jr. Contouring, finishing, and polishing class 5 restorative materials. Operative Dentistry 1997;22:30-6.
6. Friedl K-H, Powers JM, Hiller K-A. Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Operative Dentistry 1995;20:74-80.
7. Holtan JR, Nystrom GP, Olin PS, Rudney J, Douglas WH. Bond strength of a light-cured and two auto-cured glass ionomer liners. J Dent 1990;18:271-5.
8. Pawlus MA, Swift Jr EJ, Vargas MA. Shear bond strengths of resin ionomer restorative materials [abstract]. J Dent Res 1994;73:328. Abstract 1812.
9. Stattmiller SP, Burgess JO. Shear bond strengths of two glass ionomers to contaminated dentin [abstract]. J Dent Res 1994;73:328. Abstract 1814.
10. Swift EJ Jr, Pawlus MA, Vargas MA. Shear band strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. Operative Dentistry 1995;20:138-43.
11. Cao DS, Hollis RA, Hicken CB, Christensen RP. Fluoride release from glass ionomers, glass ionomer/resins and composites [abstract]. J Dent Res 1994;73:184. Abstract 657.
12. Dunne SM, Goolnik JS, Millar BJ, Seddon RP. Caries inhibition by a resin-modified and a conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro. J Dent 1996;24:91-4.
13. Forss H. Release of fluoride and other elements from light-cured glass ionomers in neutral and acidic conditions. J Dent Res 1993;72:1257-62.
14. Mitra SB. In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glassionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 1991;70:75-8.
15. Momoi Y, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from light-activated glass ionomer restorative cements. Dental Materials 1993;9:151-4.
16. Hammesfahr PD. Developments in resionomer systems. In: Hunt PR, editor. Glass ionomers - the next generation: proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on glass ionomers. Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC; 1994. p. 47-56.
17. 3M Vitremer tri-cure glass ionomer system: technical product profile. St. Paul, Minn.: 3M Dental Products; 1992.
18. Mitra S. Curing reaction of glass ionomer materials. In: Hunt PR, editor. Glass ionomers - the next generation: proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on glass ionomers. Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC; 1994. p. 13-22.
19. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry 1995;8:59-67.
20. Chen RCS. Cytotoxicity of light-cured glass ionomer cements on two cell culture systems [abstract]. J Dent Res 1994;73:133. Abstract 253.
21. Cox CF, Erickson RL, Glasspoole E. Histologic pulp response of a new tri-cure glass ionomer [abstract]. J Dent Res 1993;72:348. Abstract 1960.
22. Gaintantzopoulou MD, Willis GP, Kafrawy AH. Pulp reactions to light-cured glass-ionomer cements. American Journal of Dentistry 1994;7:39-42.
23. Bazzucchi M, Mori G, Goracci G. Pulpal response to direct capping of adhesive resins and glass ionomer cements [abstract]. J Dent Res 1995;74:555. Abstract 1240.
24. Lasfargues JJ, Goldberg M. Human pulpal response to a light-cured glass ionomer cement [abstract]. J Dent Res 1995;74:945. Abstract 277.
25. Brackett WW, Gunnin TD, Johnson WW, Conkin JE. Microleakage of light-cured glass-ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence International 1995;26:583-5.
26. Cooley RL, Barkmeier WW. Dentinal shear bond strength, microleakage, and contraction gap of visible light-polymerized liners/bases. Quintessence International 1991;22:467-74.
27. Quinn F. An in-vitro investigation into the sealing ability of two fourth generation dentine bonding agents and two resin modified glass polyalkenoate restoratives. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 1995;3:119-25.
28. Sidhu SK. Sealing effectiveness of light-cured glass ionomer cement liners. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:891-4.
29. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:706-10.
30. Stanford JW. Recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials. Int Dent J 1980;30:140-88.
31. Taylor RD. Modification of the Brown and Brenn gram stain for the differential staining of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in tissue sections. Am J Clin Pathol 1966;46:472-4.
32. Cox CF, Bergenholtz G, Fitzgerald M, Keys DR, Heys RJ, Avery JK. Capping of the dental pulp mechanically exposed to oral microflora: a 5-week observation of wound healing in the monkey. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:327-39.
33. Cox CF, Bergenholtz G, Heys DR, Syed SA, Fitzgerald M, Heys RJ. Pulp capping of dental pulp mechanically exposed to the oral microflora: a 1-2 year observation of wound healing in the monkey. J Oral Pathol 1985;14:156-68.
34. Kan KC, Messer LB, Messer HH. Variability in cytotoxicity and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1997;76:1502-7.
35. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E, Bergenholtz G. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials againist exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:1-8.
36. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
37. Brännström M, Nyborg H. Points in the experimental study of pulpal response to restorative materials. Odontologisk Tidskrift 1969;77:421-6.
38. Plant CG, Tobias RS, Rippin JW, Brooks JW, Browne RM. A study of the relationship among pulpal response, microbial microleakage, and particle heterogenity in a glass-ionomer-base material. Dental Materials 1991;7:217-24.
39. Tobias RS, Plant CG, Rippin JW, Browne RM. Pulpal response to an anhydrous glass ionomer luting cement. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1989;5:242-52.
40. Tobias RS, Browne RM, Plant CG, Williams JA, Rippin JW. Pulpal response to two semihydrous glass ionomer luting cements. International Endodontic Journal 1991;24:95-107.
41. Schmalz G, Thonemann B, Riedel M, Elderton RJ. Biological and clinical investigations of a glass ionomer base material. Dental Materials 1994;10:304-13.
42. Skogedal O, Eriksen HM. Pulpal reactions to surface-sealed silicate cement and composite resin restorations. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1976;84:381-5.
43. Hosoda H, Inokoshi S, Shimada Y, Harnirattisai C, Otsuki M. Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities. Operative Dentistry 1991;16:122-9.
44. Tobias RS, Plant CG, Browne RM. A comparative pulpal study of the irritant effects of silicate cements. Br Dent J 1981;150:119-24.
45. Fitzgerald M, Heys RJ, Keys DR, Charbeneau GT. Evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: bacterial leakage. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:783-6.
46. Heys RJ, Fitzgerald M, Heys DR, Charbeneau GT. An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: pulpal histological response. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:607-11.
47. Karbakhsch M, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of light curing glass ionomer cements in various cell cultures [abstract]. J Dent Res 1994;73:183. Abstract 650.
48. Liu Y, Liao H, Li J. Evaluation of resin-modified glass ionomers in vitro and in vivo [abstract]. J Dent Res 1995;74:475. Abstract 596.
49. Sasanaluckit P, Albustany KR, Doherty PJ, Williams DF. Biocompatibility of glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 1993;14:906-16.
50. Kanaoka T, Yoshii E, Hirota K. Cytotoxicity of the light-cured glass ionomer cements [abstract]. J Dent Res 1991;70:798. Abstract 113.
51. Dogon IL, Van Leeuwen MJ, Heeley JD. Biological investigation of a new light-cured glass ionomer restorative material, [abstract]. J Dent Res 1992;71:524. Abstract 68.
52. Hume WR. Pulpal responses to glass ionomers. In: Hunt PR, editor. Glass ionomers - the next generation: proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on glass ionomers. Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC; 1994. p. 143-50.
53. Hume WR, Gerzina TM. Release of monomers from bonding resin-composite resin combinations through dentin in vitro [abstract]. J Dent Res 1994;73:224. Abstract 980.
54. Smith DC, Ruse ND. Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:654-7.