The experience of facilitation in reflective groups: A phenomenological study

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 303-309

  Murrell, Karen A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Fairlie   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEER GROUP;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; FACULTY, NURSING; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PEER GROUP;

EID: 0032080973     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0260-6917(98)80047-6     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Baker C, Wuest J, Noerager Stern P 1992 Method slurring: the grounded theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing 17 (11): 1355-1360
2. Barber P 1993 Developing the 'person' of the professional carer. In: Hinchliff S, Norman J, Schober J (eds) Nursing practice and healthcare. Edward Arnold, London
3. Barber P, Norman I 1989 Preparing teachers for the performance and evaluation of gaming simulations in experiential climates. Journal of Advanced Nursing 14 (2): 146-151
4. Beck C 1994 Reliability and validity issues in phenomenological research. Western Journal of Nursing Research 16 (3): 254-267
5. Benner P 1984 From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, California
6. Boud D, Keough R, Walker D (eds) 1985 Reflection: turning experience into reflection. Kogan Page, London
7. Brink P J 1991 Issues of reliability and validity. In: Morse J M (ed) Qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue. Sage, London
8. Brookfield S 1986 Understanding and facilitating adult learning. Open University Press, Milton Keynes
9. Burnard P 1990 Group discussion. Nursing Times 86 (37): 36
10. Collaizi P F 1978 Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Valle R S, King M (eds) Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 48-71