Semianalytical evaluation of three-dimensional velocity near a partially penetrating well in an unconfirmed aquifer

Ground Water

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 514-519

  Zlotnik, Vitaly ^a   Chen, Xunhong ^a   Sun, Bei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULICS; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; WATER WELLS;

HANTUSH SOLUTION; HYDRAULIC GRADIENTS; NEUMAN SOLUTION;

AQUIFERS;

AQUIFER; GROUNDWATER; VELOCITY PROFILE; WELL;

GROUNDWATER FLOW; SEMIANALYTICAL METHOD; VELOCITY;

EID: 0032080163     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02823.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, M.P., and W.W. Woessner. 1992. Applied Groundwater Modeling, Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport. New York: Academic Press Inc.
2. Akindunni, RF, R.W. Gillham, B. Conant, Jr. and T. Franz. 1995. Modeling of contaminant movement near pumping wells: Saturated-unsaturated flow with particle tracking. Ground Water 33, no. 2: 264-274.
3. Boulton, N.S. 1954. The drawdown of a water-table under non-steady conditions near a pumped well in an unconfined formation. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. 3, part 3: 564-579.
4. Boulton, N.S. 1963. Analysis of data from nonequilibrium pumping tests allowing for delayed yield from storage. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. 26: 469-482.
5. Dagan, G. 1967. A method of determining the permeability and effective porosity of unconfined anisotropic aquifers. Water Resources Research 3, no. 4: 1059-1071.
6. Dougherty, D.E. 1989. Computing hydraulic solutions. Ground Water 21, no. 4: 564-569.
7. Gambolati, G. 1976. Transient free surface flow to a well: An analysis of theoretical solutions. Water Resources Research 12, no. 1: 27-39.
8. Gosselin, D.C., J.F. Ayers, and Y.K. Zhang. 1994. Modeling concentration variations in high-capacity wells: Implications for groundwater sampling. Water Resources Bulletin 30, no. 4: 613-622.
9. Harmsen, B.W., J.C. Converse, M.P. Anderson, and J.A. Hoopes. 1991. A model for evaluating the three-dimensional groundwater dividing pathline between a contaminant source and a partially penetrating water-supply well. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 8, 71-90.
10. Hantush, M.S. 1964. Hydraulics of well. Advances in Hydrosciences 1, 281-432.
11. Moench, A.F. 1993. Computation of type curves for flow to partially penetrating wells in water-table aquifers. Ground Water 31, no. 6: 966-971.
12. Moench, A.F. 1995. Combing the Neuman and Boulton models for flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer. Ground Water 33, no. 3: 378-384.
13. Moench, A.F. 1996. Flow to a well in a water-table aquifer: An improved Laplace transform solution. Ground Water 34, no. 4: 593-596.
14. Neuman, S.P. 1972. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resources Research 8, no. 4: 1031-1044.
15. Neuman, S.P. 1974. Effects of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed aquifer response. Water Resources Research 10, no. 2:303-312.
16. Finder, G.F., and W.G. Gray. 1977. Finite Element Simulation in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology. New York: Academic Press Inc.
17. Stehfest, H. 1970. Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Commun. ACM. 13, 47-49.
18. Streltsova, T.D. 1972. Unsteady radial flow in an unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research 8, no. 8: 1059-1066.
19. Streltsova, T.D. 1973. Flow near a pumped well in an unconfined aquifer under nonsteady conditions. Water Resources Research 9, no. 1: 227-235.
20. Zlotnik, V.A., and G. Ledder. 1992. Groundwater flow in a compressible unconfined aquifer with uniform circular recharge. Water Resources Research 28, no. 6: 1619-1630.
21. Zlotnik, V., and G. Ledder. 1993. Groundwater velocity in an unconfined aquifer with rectangular areal recharge. Water Resources Research 29, no. 8: 2827-2834.