Morphine-induced conditioned place preference in preweanling and adult rats

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 217-222

  Randall, C K ^a   Kraemer, P J ^a   Bardo, M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioned place preference; CPP; Morphine; Ontogeny; Rattus norvegicus

Indexed keywords

MORPHINE;

AGE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, SUCKLING; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MORPHINE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REWARD; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

ANIMALIA; RATTUS NORVEGICUS;

EID: 0032078864     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00585-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bardo M. T., Neisewander J. L., Pierce R. C. Novelty-induced place preference behavior in rats. Effects of opiate and dopaminergic drugs Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 32:1990;683-687.
2. Bardo M. T., Rowlett J. K., Harris M. J. Conditioned place preference using opiate and stimulant drugs. A meta-analysis Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 19:1995;39-51.
3. Barr G. A. Reinforcing properties of opiates during early development. Hammer R. P. Jr. The neurobiology of opiates. 1993;63-83 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
4. Beatty W. W. Gonadal hormones and sex differences in nonreproductive behaviors. Gerall A. A., Moltz H., Ward I. L. Sexual differentiation. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, vol. 11. 1992;85-128 Plenum Press, New York.
5. Blander A., Hunt T., Blair R., Amit Z. Conditioned place preference. An evaluation of morphine's positive reinforcing properties Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 84:1984;124-127.
6. Bolles R. C., Woods P. J. The ontogeny of behaviour in the albino rat. Anim. Behav. 12:1964;427-441.
7. Bozarth M. A. Conditioned place preference. A parametric analysis using systemic heroin injections Bozarth M. A. Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. 1987;241-273 Springer Verlag, New York.
8. Bozarth M. A. An overview of assessing drug reinforcement. Bozarth M. A. Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. 1987;635-658 Springer Verlag, New York.
9. Camp L. L., Rudy J. W. Changes in the categorization of appetitive and aversive events during postnatal development of the rat. Dev. Psychobiol. 21:1988;25-42.
10. Carr G. D., Fibiger H. C., Phillips A. G. Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. Liebman J. M., Cooper S. J. Topics in experimental psychopharmacology. The neuro-pharmacological basis of reward:1989;264-319 Oxford University Press, New York.
11. Caza P. A., Spear L. P. Ontogenesis of morphine-induced behavior in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 13:1980;45-50.
12. Chen K. K., Robbins E. B. Age of animals and drug action. J. Am. Pharmacol. Assoc. 33:1944;80-82.
13. Eddy N. B. Studies of morphine, codeine and their derivatives. The variation with age in the toxic effects of morphine, codeine and some of their derivatives. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 66:1939;182-201.
14. Ellinwood E. H. Jr. "Accidental conditioning" with chronic methamphetamine intoxication. Implications for a theory of drug habituation Psychopharmacologia. 21:1971;131-138.
15. Kehoe P. Opioids, behavior, and learning in mammalian development. Blass E. M. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology. Developmental psychobiology and behavioral ecology, vol. 9:1988;309-346 Plenum Press, New York.
16. Kehoe P., Blass E. M. Behaviorally functional opioid systems in infant rats. I. Evidence for olfactory and gustatory classical conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 100:1986;359-367.
17. Kelly P. H. Drug-induced motor behavior. Iversen L. I., Iversen S. D., Snyder S. H. Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol. 8. 1977;295-331 Plenum Press, New York.
18. Kraemer P. J., Kraemer E. G., Smoller D., Spear N. E. Enhancement of flavor aversion in weanling but not in adult rats by prior conditioning to an odor. Psychobiology. 17:1989;34-42.
19. Kupferberg H. J., Way E. L. Pharmacologic basis for the increased sensitivity of the newborn rat to morphine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 141:1963;105-112.
20. Lariviere N. A., Chen W. J., Spear N. E. The influence of olfactory context on Pavlovian conditioning and its expression in preweanling (16-day-old) and adult rats. Anim. Learn. Behav. 18:1990;179-190.
21. Leslie F. M., Loughlin S. E. Ontogeny and plasticity of opioid systems. Hammer R. P. Jr. The neurobiology of opiates. 1993;85-123 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
22. Mucha R. F., Iversen S. D. Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences. A procedural examination Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 82:1984;241-247.
23. Parker L. A. Place conditioning in a three- or four-choice apparatus. Role of stimulus novelty in drug-induced place conditioning Behav. Neurosci. 106:1992;294-306.
24. Randall C. K., Kraemer P. J., Dose J. M., Carbary T. J., Bardo M. T. The biphasic effect of morphine on odor conditioning in neonatal rats. Dev. Psychobiol. 25:1992;355-364.
25. Randall C. K., Kraemer P. J., Valone J. M., Bardo M. T. Odor conditioning with morphine. Conditioned preference, aversion, and analgesia Psychobiology. 21:1993;215-220.
26. Reid L. D., Marglin S. H., Mattie M. E., Hubbell C. L. Measuring morphine's capacity to establish a place preference. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 33:1989;765-775.
27. Schechter M. D., Calcagnetti D. J. Trends in place preference conditioning with a cross-indexed bibliography. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 17:1993;21-41.
28. Shippenberg T. S., Emmett-Oglesby M. W., Herz A. Morphine-induced place conditioning is not confounded by drug-induced alterations in locomotor activity. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 32:1989;129-132.
29. Smith C. A., Holman E. W. Rewarding and aversive effects of stimulant drugs in infant rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 26:1987;211-215.
30. Solheim G. S., Hensler J. G., Spear N. E. Age-dependent contextual effects on short-term active avoidance retention in rats. Behav. Neural Biol. 30:1980;250-259.
31. Spear L. P. Neurobehavioral assessment during the early postnatal period. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 12:1990;489-495.
32. Spear N. E. Ecologically determined dispositions control the ontogeny of learning and memory. Kail R., Spear N. E. Comparative perspectives on the development of memory. 1984;325-358 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
33. Spear N. E., Rudy J. W. Tests of the ontogeny of learning and memory. Issues, methods, and results Shair H. N., Barr G. A., Hofer M. A. Developmental psychobiology. New methods and changing concepts:1991;84-113 Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Sullivan R. M., Hall W. G. Reinforcers in infancy. Classical conditioning using stroking or intra-oral infusion of milk as UCS Dev. Psychobiol. 21:1988;215-223.
35. Swerdlow N. R., Koob G. F. Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 84:1984;163-166.
36. Tinbergen N. On aims and methods in ethology. Z. Psychol. 20:1963;410-433.
37. van der Kooy D. Place conditioning. A simple and effective method for assessing the motivational properties of drugs Bozarth M. Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. 1987;229-240 Springer Verlag, New York.
38. Vezina P., Stewart J. Conditioned locomotion and place preference elicited by tactile cues paired exclusively with morphine in an open field. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 91:1987;375-380.
39. Weller A., Blass E. M. Cholecystokinin conditioning in rats. Ontogenetic determinants Behav. Neurosci. 104:1990;199-206.
40. Wise R. A., Bozarth M. A. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;469-492.