Factor analysis of nutrient distribution patterns under shrub live-oak in two contrasting soils

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 805-809

  Brejda, John J ^a  

^a USDA NRCS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; CARBON; CLAY; ECOSYSTEMS; ION EXCHANGE; MAGNESIUM; NITROGEN; PH; PLANTS (BOTANY); SAND; SILT; STATISTICAL METHODS;

FACTOR ANALYSIS; NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTION;

SOILS;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS TURBINELLA; QUERCUS VIRGINIANA; TURBINELLA;

EID: 0032077770     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200030038x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Black, C.A., D.D. Evans, L.E. Ensminger, J.L. White, and F.E. Clark (ed.). 1965. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
2. Blackburn, W.H., and F.B. Pierson. 1994. Sources of variation in interrill erosion on rangelands. p. 1-9. In W.H. Blackburn et al. (ed.) Variability in rangeland water erosion processes. SSSA Spec. Publ. 38. SSSA, Madison, WI.
3. Bohn, H., B. McNeal, and G. O'Connor. 1979. Soil chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
4. Branson, F.A. 1985. Vegetation changes on western rangelands. Range Monogr. 2. Soc. Range Manage., Denver, CO.
5. Carmicheal, R.S., O.D. Knipe, C.P. Pase, and W.W. Brady. 1978. Arizona chaparral: Plant associations and ecology. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-202. Rocky Mount. For. Range Exp. Stn., Fort Collins, CO.
6. Charley, J.L., and N.E. West. 1975. Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. J. Ecol. 63:945-963.
7. Fairchild, J.A., and J.D. Brotherson. 1980. Microhabitat relationships of six major shrub species in Navajo National Monument, Arizona. J. Range Manage. 33:150-156.
8. Graham, R.C., and H.B. Wood. 1991. Morphologic development and clay redistribution in lysimeter soils under chaparral and pine. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:1638-1646.
9. Holland, D. A. 1969. Component analysis - an approach to the interpretation of soil data. J. Sci. Food Agric. 20:26-31.
10. James, F.C., and C.E. McCulloch. 1990. Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora's box? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:129-166.
11. Johnson, R.A., and D.W. Wichern. 1992. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. Karamanos, R.E. 1980. Potassium status of some soils of northern Greece in relation to clay mineralogy and other soil properties. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 11:723-739.
13. Leopold, A. 1924. Grass, brush, timber, and fire in southern Arizona. J. For. 22:1-10.
14. Norris, J.M. 1970. Multivariate methods in the study of soils. Soils Fert. 33:313-318.
15. Page, A.L., R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney (ed.). 1982. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
16. Pase, C.P., and D.E. Brown. 1982. Interior chaparral. p. 95-99. In D.E. Brown (ed.) Biotic communities of the American southwest - United States and Mexico. Desert Plants 4:1-4.
17. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: Statistics. Version 5 ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
18. Schlesinger, W.H., J.F. Reynolds, F.L. Cunningham, L.F. Huenneke, W.M. Jarrell, R.A. Virginia, and W.G. Whitford. 1990. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science (Washington, DC) 247:1043-1048.
19. Sharma, S. 1996. Applied multivariate techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
20. Steel, R.G.D., and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
21. Willen, D.W. 1965. Surface soil texture and potential erodibility characteristics of some southern Sierra Nevada forest sites. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29:213-218.
22. Woolridge, D.D. 1964. Effects of parent material and vegetation on properties related to soil erosion in central Washington. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28:430-432.