n-Alkyl fluorenyl phases in chromatography. I. Synthesis and characterization

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 805, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 71-83

  Wielandt, Wolfram ^a   Ellwanger, Arndt ^b   Albert, Klaus ^b   Lindner, Ekkehard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Institut fur Organische Chemie   (Germany)

Author keywords

interactions; Fluorenyl alkyl silanes; Interphases; LC; Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; Solid state NMR spectroscopy; Stationary phases

Indexed keywords

FLUORENE DERIVATIVE; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON; SILANE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHASE SEPARATION; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNTHESIS;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; FLUORENES; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SILANES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET;

STAPHYLOCOCCUS PHAGE 3A;

EID: 0032076035     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00014-4     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. K.K. Unger (Editor), Chromatogr. Sci., Vol. 47 (Packings and Stationary Phases in Chromatographic Techniques), Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, 1990.
2. L.C. Sander, S.A. Wise, in R.M. Smith (Editor), Retention and Selectivity in Liquid Chromatography (Journal of Chromatography Library, Vol. 57), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995, p. 337.
3. F. Mikes, G. Boshart, E. Gil-Av, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., (1976) 99.
4. F. Mikes, G. Boshart, E. Gil-Av, J. Chromatogr., 122 (1976) 205.
5. N. Tanaka, Y. Tokuda, K. Iwaguchi, M. Araki, J. Chromatogr., 239 (1982) 761.
6. C.H. Lochmüller, M.L. Hunnicutt, R.W. Beaver, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 21 (1983) 444.
7. M. Verzele, N. van de Velde, Chromatographia, 20 (1985) 239.
8. M. Diack, R.N. Compton, G. Guiochon, J. Chromatogr., 639 (1993) 129.
9. M. Funk, H. Frank, F. Oesch, K.L. Platt, J. Chromatogr. A, 659 (1994) 57.
10. R. Brindle, K. Albert, J. Chromatogr. A, 757 (1997) 3.
11. A. Ellwanger, R. Brindle, K. Albert, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 20 (1997) 39.
12. H.-J. Egelhaaf, D. Oelkrug, A. Ellwanger, K. Albert, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., in press.
13. H. Hemetsberger, in K. K. Unger (Editor), Chromatogr. Sci., Vol. 47 (Packings and Stationary Phases in Chromatographic Techniques), Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, 1990, p. 511.
14. A. Tchapla, S. Heron, E. Lesellier, H. Colin, J. Chromatogr. A, 656 (1993) 81.
15. J.G. Dorsey, K.A. Dill, Chem. Rev., 89 (1989) 331.
16. M. Pursch, S. Strohschein, H. Händel, K. Albert, Anal. Chem., 68 (1996) 386.
17. F.R. Hartley, Supported Metal Complexes, D. Reidel, Boston, MA, 1985.
18. U. Deschler, P. Kleinschmit, P. Panster, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 25 (1986) 236.
19. E. Lindner, M. Kemmler, H.A. Mayer, P. Wegner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 348.
20. E. Lindner, M. Kemmler, T. Schneller, H.A. Mayer, Inorg. Chem., 34 (1995) 5489.
21. E. Lindner, A. Jäger, T. Schneller, H.A. Mayer, Chem. Mater., 9 (1997) 81.
22. E. Lindner, A. Jäger, M. Kemmler, F. Auer, P. Wegner, H.A. Mayer, A. Benez, E. Plies, Inorg. Chem., 36 (1997) 862.
23. E.S.P. Bouvier, S.A. Oehrle, LC·GC Int., 8 (1995) 338.
24. K. Albert, E. Bayer, J. Chromatogr., 544 (1991) 345.
25. C.A. Fyfe (Editor), Solid State NMR for Chemists, C.F.C. Press, Guelph, Ontario, 1983.
26. L.C. Sander, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 26 (1988) 380.
27. L.C. Sander, S.A. Wise, LC·GC Int., 3 (1990) 24.
28. W. Schöniger, Microchim. Acta, (1955) 123.
29. A. Dirschel, F. Erne, Microchim. Acta (1961) 866.
30. C.K. Narula, K.T. Mak, R.F. Heck, J. Org. Chem., 48 (1983) 2792.
31. A. Singh, M.A. Markowitz, New J. Chem., 18 (1994) 377.
32. Due to the incomplete hydrosilation reaction no satisfactory elemental analyses were obtainable. Because of the still present educt, the carbon value was found to be too high, whereas the hydrogen value was too low.
33. J. Schmid, K. Albert, E. Bayer, J. Chromatogr. A, 694 (1995) 333.
34. K. Albert, A. Rieker, Chem. Ber., 110 (1977) 1804.
35. S. Gronert, A. Streitwieser, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 2836.
36. K. Patsidis, H.G. Alt, J. Organomet. Chem., 501 (1995) 31.
37. 0), two signals in the alkyl area are attributed to the terminal methylene groups of the spacer. Due to the sensitivity of the silyl group to moisture, purification of these compounds proved to be difficult. However, further purification is not necessary because the educts 1 and 2 are washed out during the modification process.
38. M. Capka, P. Svoboda, V. Bazant, V. Chvalovsky, Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 36 (1971) 2785.
39. B. Buszewski, Chromatographia, 34 (1992) 573.
40. M, T, Q=one, two and three SiO and SiCl bonds, respectively; n=0-3, m=0-4.
41. G.E. Maciel, D.W. Sindorf, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102 (1980) 7606.
42. E. Bayer, K. Albert, J. Reiners, M. Nieder, D. Müller, J. Chromatogr., 264 (1983) 197.
43. M. Pursch, R. Brindle, A. Ellwanger, L.C. Sander, C.M. Bell, H. Händel, K. Albert, Solid-State NMR, in press.
44. J.J. Pesek, M.T. Matyska, J. Ramakrishnan, Chromatographia, 44 (1997) 538.
45. S.F. Dec, C.E. Bronnimann, R.A. Wind, G.E. Maciel, J. Magn. Reson., 82 (1989) 454.
46. R. Brindle, M. Pursch, K. Albert, Solid-State NMR, 6 (1996) 251.
47. M. Pursch, L. Sander, K. Albert, Anal Chem., 68 (1996) 4107.