Defense frontier analysis of quantum cryptographic systems

Applied Optics

Volumn 37, Issue 14, 1998, Pages 2869-2878

  Slutsky, Boris ^a   Rao, Ramesh ^a   Sun, Pan Cheng ^a   Tancevski, Ljubiša ^a   Fainman, Shaya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AMPLIFICATION; COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; ERROR CORRECTION; PHOTONS; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM OPTICS; SECURITY OF DATA; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

DEFENSE FRONTIER ANALYSIS; INDIVIDUAL EAVESDROPPING ATTACK; KEY DISTILLATION; QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHIC SYSTEM; SECRECY CAPACITY;

CRYPTOGRAPHY;

EID: 0032073168     PISSN: 1559128X     EISSN: 21553165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/AO.37.002869     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing, ” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing (IEEE, New York, 1984), pp. 175-179.
2. A. K. Ekert, “Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem, ” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661-663 (1991).
3. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and N. D. Mermin, “Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem, ” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 557-559 (1992).
4. C. H. Bennett, F. Bessette, G. Brassard, L. Salvail, and J. Smolin, “Experimental quantum cryptography, ” J. Cryptol. 5, 3-28 (1992).
5. C. H. Bennett, “Quantum cryptography using any two non-orthogonal states, ” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121-3124 (1992).
6. B. Slutsky, P. C. Sun, Y. Mazurenko, R. Rao, and Y. Fainaman, “Effect of channel imperfection on the secrecy capacity of a quantum cryptographic system, ” J. Mod. Opt. 44, 953-961 (1997).
7. E. Biham and T. Mor, “Security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks, ” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2256-2259 (1997).
8. E. Biham and T. Mor, “Bounds on information and the security of quantum cryptography, ” Phys. Rev. Lett 79, 4034-4037 (1997).
9. D. Mayers, “Quantum key distribution and string oblivious transfer in noisy channels, ” in Advances in Cryptology, CRYPTO’96, N. Kobitz, ed., Vol. 1109 of Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series (Springer, New York, 1996), pp. 343-357.
10. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, and U. M. Maurer, “Generalized privacy amplification, ” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 41, 1915-1923 (1995).
11. B. Huttner, N. Imoto, N. Gisin, and T. Mor, “Quantum cryptography with coherent states, ” Phys. Rev. A 51, 1863-1869 (1995).
12. H. Yuen, “Quantum amplifiers, quantum duplicators, and quantum cryptography, ” Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 8, 939-949 (1996).
13. C. Cachin and U. M. Maurer, “Linking information reconciliation and privacy amplification, ” J. Cryptol. 10, 97-110 (1997).
14. C. A. Fuchs and A. Peres, “Quantum-state disturbance versus information gain: uncertainty relations for quantum information, ” Phys. Rev. A 53, 2038-2045 (1996).
15. C. A. Fuchs, N. Gisin, R. B. Griffiths, C.-S. Niu, and A. Peres, “Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography. I. Information bound and optimal strategy, ” Phys. Rev. A 56, 1163-1172 (1997).
16. B. Slutsky, R. Rao, P.-C. Sun, and Y. Fainman, “Security of quantum cryptography against individual attacks, ” Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
17. A. K. Ekert, B. Huttner, G. M. Palma, and A. Peres, “Eavesdropping on quantum cryptographical systems, ” Phys. Rev. A 50, 1047-1056 (1994).