|
Volumn 36, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 748-751
|
Assessment of the Validity and Reliability of Three Systems of Medical Record Screening for Quality of Care Assessment
|
Author keywords
Medical record screening; Quality of care; Reliability; Validity
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEART INFARCTION;
HUMAN;
MASS SCREENING;
MEDICAL RECORD;
NURSING;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
RANDOMIZATION;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
TEACHING HOSPITAL;
TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;
UNITED STATES;
ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY;
BALTIMORE;
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS;
HOSPITALS, TEACHING;
HUMANS;
MASS SCREENING;
MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED;
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
RANDOM ALLOCATION;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 0032066147
PISSN: 00257079
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199805000-00014 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (14)
|
References (6)
|