Ethical review of multi-centre research: A survey of multi-centre researchers in the South Thames region

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 242-245

  Foster, Claire ^a   Holley, Sandra ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ENGLAND; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; MULTICENTER STUDIES; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH;

EID: 0032065314     PISSN: 00358819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. NHS Executive. Ethics committee review of multi-centre research. HSG(97)23, 14th April 1997.
2. Harries, UJ, Fenem PH, Tuxworth W, Hoinville W. Local research ethics committees: widely differing responses to a national survey protocol. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1994;28:150-4.
3. Penn ZJ, Steer PJ. Local research ethics committees: hindrance or help? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:1-2.
4. Hotopf M, Wessely S, Norman N. Are ethical committees reliable? J R Soc Med 1995;88:31-3.
5. Ahmed AH, Nicholson KG. Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees. J Med Ethics 1996;22:263-6.
6. Foster C. Why do research ethics committees disagree with each other? J R Coll Physicians Lond 1995; 29:315-8.