Text as conversation: An interpretive investigation of utterances in a women's magazine

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 545-570

  Stoll, Pamela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032061388     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(97)00081-7     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barker, Ellen, 1988. 'Queen of House' and 'Bringing Up Hubby': The current position of women's magazines on the changing roles of women. Journal of American Culture 11(4): 1-5.
2. Ceulemans, Mieke and Guido Fauconnier, 1984. Mass media: The image, role and social conditions of women. A collection and analysis of research materials. Paris: Unesco.
3. Daniel, Jack L. and Anita L. Allen, 1988. Newsmagazines and the Black Agenda. In: Geneva Smitherman-Donaldson and Teun A. van Dijk, eds., Discourse and discrimination, 23-45. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
4. de Rycker, Teun, 1987. Turns at writing: The organization of correspondence. In: Jef Verschueren and Marcella Bertucelli-Papi, eds., The pragmatic perspective, 613-641. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. Fagoaga, Concepción and Pilar Secanella, 1987. Umbral de presencia de las mujeres en la prensa española. Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer, Ministerio de Cultura.
6. Fairclough, Norman, 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.
7. Fairclough, Norman, 1992. Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
8. Frank, Jane, 1989. On conversational involvement by mail: The use of questions in direct sales letters. Text 9(2): 231-259.
9. Galeazzi, Catherine, 1986. Les dénominations des femmes dans deux corpus de presse féminine (1974 et 1984). Cahiers de Lexicologie 49: 53-94.
10. Geis, Michael L., 1995. Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gerbner, George, 1985. Mass media discourse: Message system analysis as a component of cultural indicators. In: Teun A. van Dijk, ed., Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analyses of mass media discourse and communication, 13-25. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
12. Goffman, Erving, 1981. Replies and responses. In: Erving Goffman, Forms of talk, 5-77. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
13. Hoey, Michael, 1994. Signalling in discourse: A functional analysis of a common discourse pattern in written and spoken English. In: Malcolm Coulthard, ed., Advances in written text analysis, 26-45. London: Routledge.
14. Jefferson, Gail, 1972. Side sequences. In: David Sudnow, ed., Studies in social interaction, 294-338. New York: The Free Press.
15. Knauth, Bettina, Wolfgang Kroner and Stephan Wolff, 1990-1991. Konversationsanalyse von Texten. Angewandte Sozialforschung 16(1/2): 31-43.
16. Labov, William and David Fanshel, 1977. Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
17. Levinson, Stephen, 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Meyer-Hermann, Reinhard, 1976. Direkter und indirekter Sprechakt. Deutsche Sprache 4: 1-19.
19. Miller, Cristanne, 1987. Who talks like a women's magazine? Language and gender in popular women's and men's magazines. Journal of American Culture 10(3): 1-9.
20. Mininni, Giuseppe, 1991. Diatextual analysis of the advice column. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 23(3): 73-81.
21. Moeschler, Jacques, 1982. Dire et contredire: Pragmatique de la négation et acte de réfutation dans la conversation, Bern: Lang.
22. Montgomery, Martin, 1981. The structure of monologue. In: Malcolm Coulthard and Martin Montgomery, eds., Studies in discourse analysis, 33-39. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
23. Montgomery, Martin, 1988. D-J Talk. In: Nikolas Coupland, ed., Styles of discourse, 85-104. London: Croom Helm.
24. Mulkay, Michael, 1985. Agreement and disagreement in conversations and letters. Text 5(3): 201-227.
25. Rogers, Andy, 1978. Remarks on the analysis of assertion and the conversational role of speech acts. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 190-201.
26. Roulet, Eddy, 1980. Strategies d'interaction, modes d'implicitation et marqueurs illocutoires. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 1: 80-103.
27. Roulet, Eddy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, C. Rubattel and Marie Schelling, 1987. L'articulation du discours français contemporain. Bern: Lang.
28. Sacks, Harvey, 1992. Notes on methodology. In: I. Max Atkinson and John Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 21-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Sbisà, Marina, 1976. Speech acts e femminilità: Note sul linguaggio dei settimanali femminili. Probtemi 47: 260-283.
30. Schegloff, Emmanuel, 1938. Presequences and indirection. Analyzing speech act theory in ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 55-62.
31. Schegloff, Emmanuel, 1992. On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In: I. Max Atkinson and John Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 28-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Stoll, Pamela, 1992. Entre espejos cóncavos, reflejos convexos: Las mujeres en la prensa alicantina. Canelobre 23/24: 139-146.
33. Stoll, Pamela, 1994a. El discurso de la prensa femenina. Análisis de los actos de habla en titulares de revistas femeninas británicas. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
34. Stoll Dougall, Pamela, 1994b. Aspectos de la interacción entre escritor y lector. Un estudio pragmáticointerpretativo del dialogismo implícito en la revista femenina británica 'Cosmopolitan'. Alicante: Universidad. (Microfiche)
35. Stoll, Pamela, 1997. Speech acts and conversation: The interactional development of speech act theory. Pragmalingüística 3-4: 465-475.
36. Tadros, Angele, 1994. Predictive categories in expository text. In: Malcolm Coulthard, ed., Advances in written text analysis, 69-82. London: Routledge.
37. Talbot, Mary M., 1995a. Fictions at work: Language and social practice in fiction. London: Longman.
38. Talbot, Mary M., 1995b. A synthetic sisterhood: False friends in a teenage magazine. In: Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz, eds., Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self, 143-65. London: Routledge.
39. van Dijk, Teun A., 1988. News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. van Rees, M.A., 1992. The adequacy of speech act theory for explaining conversational phenomena: A response to some conversation analytical critics. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 31-47.
41. Verschueren, Jef, 1995. Metapragmatics. In: Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman and Jan Blommaert, eds., Handbook of pragmatics, 367-371. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42. White, Cynthia L., 1970. Women's magazines 1693-1968. London: Michael Joseph.
43. Winship, Janice, 1987. Inside women's magazines. London: Pandora.
44. Winship, Janice, 1992. The impossibility of best: Enterprise meets domesticity in the practical women's magazine of the 1980's. In: Dominic Strinati and Stephen Wagg, eds., Come on down?: Popular media and culture in post-war Britain, 82-115. London: Routledge.