The speech act status of incitement: Perlocutionary acts revisited

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 571-596

  Kurzon, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032061303     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(97)00083-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Austin, John, 1976 [1962]. How to do things with words. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bach, K. and R.M. Harnish, 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
3. Chaiken, S., A. Liberman and A.H. Eagly, 1989. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: J.S. Uleman and J.A. Bargh, eds., Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intension and control, 212-252. New York: Guilford.
4. Cohen, Ted, 1973. Illocutions and perlocutions. Foundations of Language 9: 492-503.
5. Davis, S., 1980. Perlocution. In: J. Searle, F. Kiefer and M. Bierwisch, eds., Speech act theory and pragmatics, 37-55. Dordrecht: Reidel.
6. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst, 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris.
7. Govern, James R., 1982. Anatomy of a lynching: The killing of Clause Neal. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana University Press.
8. Greenawalt, Kent, 1989. Speech, crime and the uses of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Gu, Yueguo, 1993. The impasse of perlocution. Journal of Pragmatics 20(5): 405-432.
10. Hogg, Michael A. and Graham M. Vaughan, 1995. Social psychology: An introduction. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
11. van den Hoven, Paul J., 1988. Legal argumentation as an illocutionary act complex: A critical analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 1(1): 29-45.
12. Kurzon, Dennis, 1986. It is hereby performed: Explorations in legal speech acts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. Kurzon, Dennis, 1993. Entrapped by words: Semiotic studies of Thomas Hardy's novels. Semiotica 95(3/4): 261-323.
14. Kurzon, Dennis, 1996. To speak or not to speak': The comprehensibility of the revised police caution. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 9(25): 3-16.
15. Leech, Geoffrey N., 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
16. Maley, Y., 1994. The language of the law. In: J. Gibbons, ed., Language and the law, 11-50. London: Longman.
17. Petty, R.E. and J.T. Cacioppo, 1981. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
18. Redish, Martin H., 1984. Freedom of expression: A critical analysis. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
19. Sbisà, Marina, 1983. Some remarks on belief, confidence and cooperation. In: H. Parret, ed., On believing: Epistemological and semiotic approaches, 302-315. Berlin: de Gruyter.
20. Sbisà, Marina, 1988. Response to P.J. van den Hoven. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 1(1): 47-50.
21. Searle, John, 1975. Indirect speech acts. In: Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, eds., Syntax and semantics: Speech acts, 59-82. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in: John Searle, 1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
22. Smith, J.C., 1981. Secondary participation and inchoate offences. In: Crime, proof and punishment: Essays in memory of Sir Rupert Cross, 21-44. London: Butterworths.
23. Trosborg, Anna, 1995. Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 31-53.
24. Wierzbicka, Anna, 1987. English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.
25. Williams, Glanville, 1961. Criminal law. 2nd edition. London: Stevens.