Predictors of mammography utilization in missouri, 1993-1994

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 29-42

  Ali Abarghoui, Farnoush ^a   Simoes, Eduardo J ^a,b   Newschaffer, Craig J ^c   Tao, Xi ^b   Mack, Nilsa E ^b   Brownson, Ross C ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast and cervical cancer control project; Breast cancer; Mammography; Medically underserved sample; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EDUCATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICALLY UNDERSERVED AREA; MIDDLE AGED; MISSOURI; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SAMPLING STUDIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; WOMEN;

EID: 0032060733     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: 15505022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199805000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures-1996, Publication No. 96-300M-no. 5008.96. Atlanta, GA: ACS, 1996.
2. Kelsey, J.L., and Berstein, L. Epidemiology and Prevention of Breast Cancer. Annuai Review of Public Health 17 (1996): 47-67.
3. Boring, C.C., et al. Cancer Statistics, 1993. 43 (1993): 7-26.
4. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures-1996. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1995.
5. Murphy, G.P., et al., eds. American Cancer Society Textbook of Clinical Oncology, 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Pan American Health Organization Publications Marketing Program, 1995, 12.
6. Shapiro, S. The Status of Breast Cancer Screening: A Quarter of a Century of Research. World Journal of Surgery. 13 (1989): 9-18.
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute. Cancer Statistics Review: 1973-1986. Bethesda, MD: Publication No. 89-2789, May 1989.
8. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
9. Marwick, C. Medical News and Perspective: NCI Board Votes to Keep Mammography Guidelines. Journal of the American Medical Association 270 (1993): 2783.
10. Dodd, G.D. American Cancer Society Guidelines from the Past to the Present. Cancer 72 Supp. (1993): 1429-3142.
11. Capron, A.M. Practice Guidelines: How Good Are Medicines New Recipes? Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 23 (1995): 47-48.
12. Romans, M.C. Utilization of Mammography: Social and Behavioral Trends. Cancer 72 Supp. (1993): 1475-1477.
13. Nystrom, L., et al. Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography: Overview of Swedish Randomized Trials. Lancet 341 (1993):973-978.
14. Tabar, L., et al. Efficacy of Breast Cancer Screening by Age. Cancer 75 (1995): 2507-2517.
15. Kerlikowske, K., et al. Efficacy of Screening Mammography. Journal of American Medical Association 273 (1995): 149-154.
16. de Koning, H.J., et al. Quantitative Interpretation of Age-Specific Mortality Reductions From the Swedish Breast Cancer-Screening Trials. Journal of National Cancer Institute 87 (1995): 1217-1223.
17. U.S. Public Health Service. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives-Full Report, with Commentary. DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 91-50212. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1991.
18. Missouri Department of Health. Division of Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. BCCCP overview. Columbia, MD: 1994.
19. Henson, R.M., et al. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: A Comprehensive Public Health Response to Two Major Health Issues for Women. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2 (1996): 36-47.
20. Fulton, J.P., et al. A Study Guided by the Health Belief Model of the Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening of Women Ages 40 and Older. Public Health Reports 106 (1991): 410-420.
21. Champion, V. Relationship of Age to Mammography Compliance. Cancer 74 Supp. (1994): 329-335.
22. Mandelblatt, J., et al. Targeting Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening to Elderly Poor Black Women: Who Will Participate? Preventive Medicine 22 (1993): 20-33.
23. Remington, P.L., et al. Design, Characteristics, and Usefulness of State-Based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance: 1981-1987. Public Health Report 103 (1988):366-375.
24. Waksberg, J.S. Sampling Methods for Random Digit Dialing. Journal of the American Statistic Association 73 (1978): 40-46.
25. SAS Institute. SAS, Users Guide: Basics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1991.
26. SUDAAN Users Manual. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1995.
27. Anderson, L.M., et al. Design and Use of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Illinois Morbidity and Mortality Review 1 (1994): 16-18.
28. Hosmer, D.W., et al. The Importance of Assessing the Fit of the Logistic Regression Models. American Journal of Public Health 81 (1991): 1660-1635.
29. U.S. Public Health Service. Trends in Cancer Screening-United States, 1987 and 1992. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 45 (1995): 57-61.
30. Mayer, J.A., et al. Breast and Cervical Screening in Older Women: The San Diego Medicare Preventive Health Project. Preventive Medicine 21 (1992): 395-404.
31. Zapka, J.G., et al. Interval Adherence to Mammography Screening Guidelines. Medical Care 29 (1991): 697-707.
32. Anderson, L.M., and May, D.S. Has the Use of Cervical, Breast, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Increased in the United States? American Journal of Public Health 85 (1995): 840-842.
33. Kaluzny, A.D., et al. The National Cancer Institute and Guideline Development: Lessons from the Breast Cancer Screening Controversy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 86(1994): 901-903.
34. Rakowski, W., et al. Integrating Behavior and Intention Regarding Mammography by Respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Public Health Reports 108 (1993): 605-624.
35. Calle, E.E., et al. Demographic Predictors of Mammography and Pap Smear Screening in US Women. American Journal of Public Health 83 (1993): 53-60.
36. Taplin, S., et al. Breast Cancer Risk and Participation in Mam-mographic Screening. American Journal of Public Health 79 (1989): 1494-1498.
37. Miller, A.N., and Champion, V.L. Mammography in Women 50 Years of Age: Predisposing and Enabling Characteristics. Cancer Nursing 16(1993): 260-269.
38. Grady, K.E., et al. The Importance of Physician Encouragement in Breast Cancer Screening of Older Women. Preventive Medicine 21 (1992):766-780.
39. Kottke, T.E., et al. Cancer Screening Behaviors and Attitudes of Women in Southeastern Minnesota. Journal of the American Medical Association 273 (1995): 1099-1105.
40. Lerman, C., et al. Factors Associated with Repeat Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening. Preventive Medicine 19 (1990): 1-12.
41. Kruse, J., and Phillips, D.M. Factors Influencing Women's Decision to Undergo Mammography. Obstetrics and Gynecology 70 (1987): 744-748.
42. Rimer, B.K., et al. Why Do Some Women Get Regular Mammograms? American Journal of Preventive Medicine 7 (1991): 69-74.
43. Coll, P.P., et al. Effects of Age, Education, and Physicians Advice on Utilization Screening Mammography. Journal of American Geriatrics Society 37 (1989): 957-962.
44. Albanês, D., et al. A Survey of Physicians Breast Cancer Early Detection Practices. Preventive Medicine 17 (1988): 643-652.
45. Munn, E.M. Nonparticipation in Mammography Screening: Apathy, Anxiety or Cost? New Zealand Medical Journal. 106 (2013) 284-286.
46. Breen, N., and Kessler, L. Changes in the Use of Screening Mammography: Evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Survey. American Journal of Public Health. 84(1994): 62-67.
47. Urban, N., et al. Mammography Screening: How Important is Cost as a Barrier to Use? American Journal of Public Health 84 (2014) 50-55.
48. National Center for Health Statistics. Journal of National Cancer Institute 88 (1996): 710.
49. Farley, T.A., and Flannery, J.T. Late-stage Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Women of Lower Socioeconomic Status: Public Health Implications. American Journal of Public Health 79 (1989): 1508-1512.
50. Rakowski, W., et al. Correlates of Mammography Among Women with Low and High Socioeconomic Resources. Preventive Medicine 24 (1995): 149-158.
51. Lerman, C., et al. Mammography Adherence and Psychological Distress Among Women at Risk for Breast Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85 (1993): 1074-1080.
52. Harper, A.P. Mammography Utilization in the Poor and Medically Underserved. Cancer 72 Supp. (1993): 1478-1482.
53. Simoes, E.J., et al. The Association Between Leisure-time Physical Activity and Dietary Fat in American Adults. American Journal of Public Health 85 (1995):240-244.
54. Brownson, R.C., et al. Reliability of Information on Chronic Disease Risk Factors Collected in the Missouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Epidemiology 5(1994): 545-549.
55. Rimer, B.K. Interventions to Increase Breast Screening: Life Span and Ethnicity Issues. Cancer 74 Supp. (1994): 323-328.
56. Suarez, L., et al. Local Health Departments Implement a Theory-Based Model to Increase Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening. Public Health Reports 108 (1993): 477-483.