Comparative evaluation of two models for estimating sample sizes for tests on trends across repeated measurements

Controlled Clinical Trials

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 188-197

  Overall, John E ^a   Shobaki, Ghassan ^a   Anderson, Cheryl B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Frequency of measurements; Linear trends; Power; Rates of change; Repeated measurements; Sample size

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; SAMPLING;

EID: 0032054975     PISSN: 01972456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00095-0     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Diggle P, Liang KY, Zeger SL Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 1994;Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Dwyer JH, Feinleib M, Lippert Pet al. Statistical Models for Longitudinal Studies of Health. 1992;Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Kirby AJ, Galai N, Muñoz A Sample size estimation using repeated measurements on biomarkers as outcomes. Controlled Clin Trials. 15:1994;165-172.
4. Laird NM, Ware JH Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 38:1982;963-974.
5. Muñoz A, Carey VJ, Schouten JPet al. A parametric family of correlation structures for the analysis of longitudinal data. Biometrics. 48:1992;733-742.
6. Overall JE How many repeated measurements are useful? J Clin Psych. 52:1996;243-252.
7. Overall JE, Doyle SR Estimating sample sizes for repeated measurement designs. Controlled Clin Trials. 15:1994;100-123.