Variations between continuous and spot-sampling techniques in monitoring a change in river-water quality

Water and Environment Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 124-129

  Hazelton, C ^a  

^a ENVIRONMENT AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Monitoring; River water quality; Spot sampling

Indexed keywords

EFFLUENT TREATMENT; RIVERS; SAMPLING; SEWAGE TREATMENT; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL; WATER QUALITY;

CONTINUOUS SAMPLING; SPOT SAMPLING; WATER QUALITY MONITORING;

WATER ANALYSIS;

RIVER WATER;

MONITORING; RIVER WATER QUALITY; SAMPLING;

ARTICLE; EFFLUENT; MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; SAMPLING; SEWAGE TREATMENT; TECHNIQUE; UNITED KINGDOM; WATER QUALITY;

UK, ENGLAND, WEST SUSSEX, MOLE RIVER;

EID: 0032053493     PISSN: 17476585     EISSN: 17476593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-6593.1998.tb00161.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Kinnburgh, J., Lloyd, P. and Farmer K. Monitoring of rivers and effluents. NRA 1991.
2. Clarke, S. A. Comparison of AQMS and water sample analysis. NRA Internal Report, 1991.
3. Brooker, S. The effects of large sewage treatment works on the quality of the River Blackwater. NRA, 1989.
4. Crumpton, W. and Isenhart, T. Diurnal patterns of ammonium and unionized ammonia in streams receiving secondary treatment effluent. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 1988, 40:539-544.
5. Ellis, J. Handbook on the Design and Interpretation of Monitoring Programmes. WRC. 1989.