Erratum: Functional magnetic resonance imaging during recognition of written words: Chinese characters for concrete objects versus abstract concepts (Journal of Neuroscience Research (1998) 30 (83-86) PII: SO168-0102(97)00108-9

Neuroscience Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 361-364

  Kansaku, K ^a   Shimoyama, I ^a   Nakajima, Y ^a   Higuchi, Y ^a   Nakazaki, S ^a   Kubota, M ^a   Morita, F ^b   Kusaka, T ^c   Katoh, K ^d   Yamaura, A ^a  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b CHIBA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c Kusaka Clinic   (Japan)

^d GE HealthCare Japan   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERRATUM; ERROR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; VISION;

ADULT; COGNITION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032053191     PISSN: 01680102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-0102(98)00044-3     Document Type: Erratum

References (13)

1. Bandettini P.A., Jesmanowicz A., Wong E.C., Hyde J.S. Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 30:1993;161-173.
2. Binder J.B., Rao S.M., Hammeke T.A., Frost J.A., Bandettini P.A., Jesmonowicz A., Hyde J.S. Lateralized human brain language systems demonstrated by subtraction functional magnetic resonance imaging. Arch. Neurol. 52:1995;593-601.
3. Brigell M., Rubboli G., Celesia G. Identification of the hemisphere activated by hemifield visual stimulation using a single equivalent dipole model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 87:1993;291-299.
4. Geschwind, N., 1972. Sci. Am. 226, 76-83.
5. Homma S., Musha T., Nakajima Y., Okamoto Y., Blom S., Flink R., Hagbarth K.-E., Mostrom U. Location of electric current sources in the human brain estimated by the dipole tracing method of the scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 91:1994;374-382.
6. Howard D., Patterson K., Wise R., Brown W.D., Friston K., Weiller C., Frackowiak R. The cortical localization of the lexicons Positron emission tomography evidence. Brain. 115:1992;1769-1782.
7. Marshall J.C., Newcombe F. Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2:1973;175-199.
8. Nakajima, Y., 1997. Event-related brain activity: analysis of EEG by means of dipole tracing method. Seitai No Kagaku 48, 25-30 (in Japanese).
9. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinbergh Inventory. Neuropsychologia. 46:1971;885-892.
10. Petersen S.E., Fox P.T., Posner M.I., Mintun M., Raichle M.E. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature. 331:1988;585-589.
11. Shimoyama, I., Nakajima, Y., Ito, T., Shibata, T., 1997. Visual evoked potentials relating to imagery: words for concrete objects versus absolute concepts. Brain Topogr. 9 (in press).
12. Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., 1988. Co-Pnanar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Thieme, Stuttgart.
13. Warrington E.K. Concrete word dyslexia. Br. J. Psychol. 72:1981;175-196.