A class of inhomogeneous shear models for seismic analysis of landfills

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 197-209

  Gunturi, Venkata Ramana ^a   Elgamal, Ahmed W M ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic; Earthquake; Elasto plastic earthquake response; Landfill; Seismic

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; ELASTOPLASTICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; SHEAR STRENGTH;

INCREMENTAL PLASTICITY; INHOMOGENEOUS SHEAR MODELS; MODAL DISPLACEMENTS;

LAND FILL;

LANDFILL; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 0032052338     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00022-5     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bray, J.D., Augello, A.J., Leonords, G.A., Repetto, P.C. and Byrne, R.J. Seismic stability procedures for solid waste landfills. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1995, 121(2).
2. Del Nero, D.E., Corcoran, B.W. & Bhatia, S.K. Seismic analysis of solid waste landfills. Geotechnical special publication No. 54, ASCE, 1995.
3. Idriss, I.M., Fiegel, G.L., Hudson, M.B., Mundy, P.K. & Herzig, R. Seismic response of operating industries landfill. Proceedings, ASCE Annual Convention, San Diego, 1995.
4. Kavazanjian, E. & Matasovic, N. Seismic analysis of solid waste landfills. Proceedings, Geoenvironment 2000, New Orleans, LA, 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 1066-1080.
5. Idriss, I.M. and Seed, H.B. Seismic response of horizontal soil layers. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(July).
6. Idriss, I.M. & Sun, J.I. SHAKE 91 - A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, University of California, Davis, 1992.
7. Roesset, J.M. Soil amplification of earthquakes. In Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, ed. C.S. Desai & J.T. Christian, Chapter 19. John Wiley, 1977.
8. Roesset, J.M. & Whitman, R. V. Theoretical background for amplification studies. MIT Research Report, 1969.
9. Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. and Scott, R.F. Analyses of earth dam response to earthquakes. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1979, GT12.
10. Ambraseys, N.N. and Sarma, S.K. The response of earth dams to earthquakes. Geotechnique, 1967, 3, 181.
11. Ambraseys, N.N. On the shear response of a two-dimensional truncated wedge subjected to an arbitrary disturbance. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1960, 50, 45.
12. Elgamal, A.M., Abdel-Gaffar, A.M. & Prevost, J.H. Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of earth dams. Princeton University Report No. 84-SM-14, 1984.
13. Gazetas, G. A new dynamic model for earth dams evaluated through case histories. Soils and Foundations, 1981, 21, 67.
14. Gazetas, G. Shear vibrations of vertically inhomogeneous earth dams. International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1982, 6, 219.
15. Makdisi, A.M. and Seed, H.B. Simplified procedure for evaluating embankment response. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1979, 105, 1427-1434.
16. Mononobe, N., Takata, A. & Matamura, M. Seismic stability of earth dams. Proceedings, 2nd Congress on Large Dams, Washington, DC, 1936, Vol. IV.
17. Seed, H.B. and Martin, G.R. The seismic coefficient in earth dam design. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1966, 92(SM3), 1.
18. Dakoulas, P. Contributions to seismic analysis of earth dams and embankments. PhD dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1985.
19. Dakoulas, P. and Gazetas, G. A class of inhomogeneous shear models for seismic response of dams and embankments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1985, 4(4), 166-182.
20. Dakoulas, P. and Gazetas, G. Seismic shear strains and seismic coefficients in dams and embankments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1986, 5(2), 75-83.
21. Shahinpoor, M., Tadjbaksh, I. and Ahmadi, G. Seismic response of hills. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, 1977, 6, 199-203.
22. Shahinpoor, M., Tadjbaksh, I. and Ahmadi, G. Seismic response of hills. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1977, 67(6, December), 1.
23. Kavazanjian, E., Jr. SASE testing at solid waste landfill facilities. NSF Workshop on Seismic Design of Solid Waste Landfills, University of Southern California, 26 and 27 August 1993.
24. Kavazanjian, E., Matasovic, N., Bonaparte, R. & Schmertman, G.R. Evaluation of MSW properties for seismic analysis. Proceedings, Geoenvironment 2000, New Orleans, LA, 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 1126-1141.
25. Elgamal, A.-W. Shear hysteretic elasto-plastic earthquake response of soil systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1991, 20, 371-387.
26. Boas, M. Mathematical Methods in Physical Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983.
27. Watson, J. Theory of Bessel Functions. Cambridge University Press, 1944.
28. Green, A.E. and Naghdi, P.M. A general theory of an elastic-plastic continuum. Archives of Rationalistic Mechanical Analysis, 1965, 18.
29. Dobry, R., Ng, T.T., Petrakis, E. and Seridi, A. A general model for the constitutive relation at the contact between two spheres. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1991, 117(6, June).
30. Konder, R.L. and Zelasko, J.S. Hyperbolic stress-strain response: cohesive soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1963, 89(SM1), 1.
31. Duncan, J.M. and Chang, C.Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1970, 96, 1629-1653.
32. Finalyson, B.A. The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles. Academic Press, New York, 1972.
33. Newmark, N.M. A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1959, 85(EM3), 67-94.
34. Mohammed, A. Personal communication. 1996.
35. DOS (Department of Sanitation, New York City). Fresh Kills landfill: geotechincal characterization. Report No. 89c4585, January 1991.
36. Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA Subtitle D (258), Seismic design guidance for municipal solid waste landfill facilities. Cincinnati, OH, 1995.
37. Atkinson, G.M. Implications of eastern ground motion characteristics for seismic hazard assessment in eastern North America. Proceedings, Symposium on Seismic Hazards, Ground Motions, Soil Liquefaction and Engineering Practice in Eastern North America, Tuxedo, New York, 1987. NCEER Report No. 87-0025.
38. Bray, J.D., Repetto, P.C., Augello, A.J. & Byrne, R.J. An overview of seismic design issues for solid waste landfills. Proceedings, GRI Conference, Drexel University, Philadelphia, 1993, pp. 242-254.
39. Nuttli, O.W. Similarities and differences between western and eastern United States earthquakes, and their consequences for earthquake engineering. In Earthquakes and Earthquake Engineering: the Eastern United States, Vol. 1, Assessing the Hazard - Evaluating the Risk, ed. J.E. Beavers. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, MI, 1981, pp. 25-51.
40. NYASWM (New York Association for Solid Waste Management). Seismic analysis and design considerations for municipal solid waste landfills. Short course, Saratoga Springs, 2-3 March 1994.
41. Gunturi, V.R. Identification and modeling of seismic response of landfills. PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 1996.