Sand state from cone penetrometer tests: A framework considering grain crushing stress

Geotechnique

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 201-215

  Konrad, J M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

In situ testing; Laboratory tests; Sands; Shear strength

Indexed keywords

SHEAR STRENGTH; SOIL TESTING;

CONE PENETROMETER TESTS (CPT);

SAND;

CONE PENETROMETER TEST; GRAIN CRUSHING; IN SITU TESTING; SAND; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS;

EID: 0032052055     PISSN: 00168505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1998.48.2.201     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baldi, G., Belloti, R., Ghionna, V., Jamiolkowski, M. & Pasqualini, E. (1982). Design parameters for sands from CPT. Proc. 2nd. Eur. Symp. Penetration Testing, ESPOT II, Amsterdam, 425-432.
2. Baldi, G., Belloti, R., Ghionna, V., Jamiolkowski, M. & Pasqualini, E. (1986). Interpretation of CPTs and CPTUs. Part 2: Drained penetration of sands. 4th Int. Geotechnical Seminar, Field Instrumentation and In Situ Measurements, Singapore, 143-156.
3. Been, K. & Jefferies, M. G. (1985). A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35, No. 2, 99-112.
4. Been, K. & Jefferies, M. G. (1986). Discussion on 'A state parameter for sands'. Géotechnique, 36, No. 2, 127-132.
5. Been, K., Jefferies, M. G., Crooks, J. H. A. & Rothenburg, L. (1987a). The cone penetration test in sands. Part II: General inference of state. Géotechnique 37, No. 3, 285-299.
6. Been, K., Lingnau, B. E., Crooks, J. H. A. & Leach, B. (1987b). Cone penetration test calibration for Erksak (Beaufort Sea) sand. Can. Geotech. J. 24, No. 4, 601-610.
7. Been, K., Jefferies, M. G. & Hachey, J. (1991). The critical state of sands. Géotechnique 41, No. 3, 365-381.
8. Chapman, G. A. & Donald, I. B. (1981). Interpretation of static penetration tests in sands. 10th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, 2, 455-458.
9. Colliat-Dangus, J.-L., Desrues, J. & Foray, P. (1988). Triaxial testing of granular soil under elevated cell pressure. Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rocks, STP 977, pp. 290-310. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
10. Couture, R., Konrad, J.-M. & Local, J. (1994). Analyse den la liquéfaction et du comportement non drainé des sables du delta de Kenamu (Project ADFEX). Rev. Can. Géotechn. 32, No. 1, 137-155.
11. Ghogomu, F. (1996). Interprétation des essais de pénétra tion au cone (CPT) dans les sables en fonction du paramètre d'état normalisé. MScA thesis, Université Laval.
12. Hird, C. C. & Hassona, F. (1986). Discussion on 'A state parameter for sands'. Géotechnique 36, No. 2, 124-126.
13. Ishihara, K. (1993). Thirty-third Rankine lecture: Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Géotechnique 41, No. 3, 349-416.
14. Kolbuszewski, J. J. (1948). An experimental study of the maximum and minimum properties of sands. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Foundation Engng, Rotterdam, 158-165.
15. Konrad, J.-M. (1988). Interpretation of flat plate dilatometer tests in sands in terms of the state parameter. Géotechnique 38, No. 2, 263-277.
16. Konrad, J.-M. (1989). The dilatometer test in sands: use and limitations. Proc. 12th. Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Foundation Engng, Rio de Janeiro, 247-250.
17. Konrad, J.-M. (1993). Undrained response of loosely compacted sands during monotonic and cyclic compression tests. Géotechnique 43, No. 1, 69-89.
18. Konrad, J.-M. (1997). In situ sand state from CPT: evaluation of a unified approach at two CANLEX sites. Can. Geotechnol. J. 1, 120-130.
19. Konrad, J.-M. & Frenchette, P. (1995). The piezoconepermeameter probe: A promising tool? Geoenvironment 2000, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 46, 1, 123-136. ASCE.
20. Parkin, A. K. & Lunne, T. (1982). Boundary effects in the laboratory calibration of a cone penetrometer in sand. Proc. 2nd Eur. Symp. Penetration Testing, ESOPT II, Amsterdam, 2, 761-768.
21. Parkin, A. K., Holden, J., Aamot, K., Last, N. & Lunne, T. (1980). Laboratory investigations of CPTs in sand, Report 52108-9. Oslo: Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.
22. Puppala, A. J., Acar, Y. B. & Tumay, M. T. (1995). Cone penetration in very weakly cemented sand. J. Geotech. Engng, 121, No. 8, 589-600.
23. Sladen, J. A. (1989). Problems with interpretation of sand state from cone penetration test. Géotechnique 39, No. 2, 323-332.
24. Schmertmann, J. H. (1978). Guidelines for cone penetration test, performance and design, Report FHWA-TS-78-209. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
25. Schnaid, F. & Houlsby, G. T. (1991). An assessment of chamber size effects in the calibration of in situ tests in sand. Géotechnique 41, No. 3, 437-446.
26. Veismanis, A. (1974). Laboratory investigation of electric friction-cone penetrometers in sand. Proc. 1st Eur. Symp. Penetration Testing, ESOPT I, Stockholm, 2.2, 407-420.
27. Villet, W. C. B. and Mitchell, J. K. (1981). Cone resistance, relative density and friction angle. Symposium on cone penetration testing and experience, pp. 178-208. Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE.