Analyse régionale des crues journalières de la province de Québec

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 360-369

  Anctil, François ^a   Martel, Nicolas ^a   Hoang, Van Diem ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b Ministere du Developpement durable de l'Environnement et des Parcs   (Canada)

Author keywords

Flood; Homogeneity; Province of Quebec; Regional analysis

Indexed keywords

FLOOD CONTROL; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; REGIONAL PLANNING; RIVERS; STANDARDIZATION; TESTING;

REGIONAL ANALYSIS;

FLOODS;

FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE;

FLOOD FREQUENCY; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE;

EID: 0032051890     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/l97-124     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Acreman, M.C., et Sinclair, C.D. 1986 Classification of drainage basins according to their physical characteristics: an application for flood frequency analysis in Scotland. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 84 : 365-380.
2. Acreman, M.C., et Wiltshire, S.E. 1987. Identification of regions for regional flood frequency analysis. Eos, 68(44) : 1262.
3. Bobée, B., Cavadias, G., Ashkar, F., Bernier, J., et Rasmussen, P., 1993. Towards a systematic approach to comparing distributions used in flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 142: 121-136.
4. Burn, D.H. 1989. Cluster analysis as applied to regional flood fre- quency. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 115(5) : 567-582.
5. Burn, D.H. 1990. Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach. Water Resources Research, 26(10) : 2257-2265.
6. Chowdhury, J.U., Stedinger, J.R., et Lu, L.H. 1991. Goodness-of-fit tests for regional generalized extreme value flood distributions. Water Resources Research, 27(7) : 1765-1776.
7. Cunnane, C. 1988. Methods and merits of regional flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 100 : 269-290.
8. Dalrymple, T. 1960. Flood frequency analysis. US Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 1543-A.
9. Desforges, P., et Tremblay, R. 1974. Analyse de la fréquence des crues pour le Québec. Direction générale des eaux, ministère des Richesses naturelles, rapport H.P.-33.
10. Fill, H.D., et Stedinger, J.R. 1995. Homogeneity tests based upon Gumbel distribution and a critical appraisal of Dalrymple's test. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 166 : 81-105.
11. GREHYS. 1996. Presentation and review of some methods for regional flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 186 : 63-84.
12. Gumbel, E.J. 1958. Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, New York.
13. Hosking, J.R.M. 1990. L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52B(2) : 105-124.
14. Hosking, J.R.M., et Wallis, J.R. 1993. Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis. Water Resources Research, 29(2) : 271-281.
15. Hosking, J.R.M., et Wallis, J.R. 1995. A comparison of unbiased and plotting-position estimators of L moments. Water Resources Research, 31(8) : 2019-2025.
16. Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., et Wood, E.F. 1985a. An appraisal of the regional flood frequency procedure in the U.K. Flood Studies Report. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 30(1) : 85-109.
17. Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., et Wood, E.F. 1985b. Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments. Technometrics, 27(3) : 251-261.
18. Lu, L.H., et Stedinger, J.R. 1992a. Variance of two- and three-parameter GEV/PWM quantile estimators: formulae, confidence intervals, and a comparison. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 138 : 247-267.
19. Lu, L.H., et Stedinger, J.R. 1992b. Sampling variance of normalized GEV/PWM quantile estimators and a regional homogeneity test. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 138 : 223-245.
20. Nathan, R.J., et McMahon, T.A. 1990. Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalization. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 121 : 217-238.
21. e conférence annuelle, Québec, pp. 587-596.
22. Önöz, B., et Bayazit, M. 1995. Best-fit distributions of largest available flood samples. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 167 : 195-208.
23. Pilon, P.J.,et Adamowski, K. 1992. The value of regional information to flood frequency analysis using the method of L-moments. Revue canadienne de génie civil, 19: 137-147.
24. Potter, K.W. 1987. Research on flood frequency analysis: 1983-1986. Reviews of Geophysics, 25(2) : 113-118.
25. Ribeiro-Corréa, J., Cavadias, G.S., Clément, B., et Rousselle, J. 1995. Identification of hydrological neighborhoods using canonical correlation analysis. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 173 : 71-89.
26. Rousselle et al. 1990. Hydrologie des crues au Canada : guide de planification et de conception. Conseil national de recherches du Canada, Ottawa.
27. Stedinger, J.R., Vogel, R.M., et Foufoula-Georgiou, E. 1993. Frequency analysis of extreme events. Dans Handbook of hydrology. Chap. 18. McGraw-Hill, New York.
28. Vogel, R.M., et Fennessey, N.M. 1993. L-moment diagrams should replace product moment diagrams. Water Resources Research, 29(6): 1742-1752.
29. Wallis, J.R., et Wood, E.F. 1985. Relative accuracy of log-Pearson III procedures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 111(7): 1043-1056.