Dimensions of machine learning in design

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 117-121

  Grecu, Dan L ^a   Brown, David C ^a  

^a Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Dimensions; Machine Learning; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COST EFFECTIVENESS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

TAXONOMY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0032051227     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0890060498122047     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bentley, P.J., & Wakefield, J.P. (1995). The table: An illustration of evolutionary design using genetic algorithms. Proc. Conf. Generic Algorithms in Engineering Systems: Innovations and Applications, IEE Conference Publication No. 414.
2. Brown, D.C. (1991). Compilation: The hidden dimension of design systems. In Intelligent CAD, III (Yoshikawa, H., & Arbab, F., Eds.) (pp. 99-108). North-Holland. Amsterdam.
3. Brown, K. (1997). Grammatical design IEEE Expert 12(2) 27-33.
4. Cross, J. (1978). Negotiation as a learning process. In The Negotiation Process - Theories and Applications (Zartman, W., Ed.), 29-54. Sage Publications.
5. Duffy, A.H.B. (1997). The "what" and "how" of learning in design. IEEE Expert 12(3), 71-77.
6. Fisher, D. (1987). Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering. Machine Learning 2, 139-172.
7. Gordon, D., & Subramanian, D. (1993). A multistrategy learning scheme for agent knowledge acquisition. Informatica 17, 331-344.
8. Grecu, D.L., & Brown, D.C. (1996). Learning by single function agents during spring design. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '96 (Gero, J.S., and Sudweeks, F., Eds.), 409-428. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Grecu, D.L., & Brown, D.C. (1997). Dimensions of machine learning in design. Web page, http://cs.wpi.edu/~dcb/AID/taxonomy.html. Computer Science Department, WPI, Worcester, MA.
10. Hutchins, E. (1991). Organizing work by adaptation. Organization Sci. 2(1), 14-39.
11. Ivezic, N., & Garrett, J.H. (1994). A neural network-based machine learning approach for supporting synthesis. Artif. Intell. Engrg. Design, Anal. Manuf. 8(2), 143-162.
12. Maher, M.L., & Pu, P. (1997). Issues and Applications of Case-Based Reasoning in Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
13. Mitchell, T., Keller, R., & Kedar-Cabelli, S. (1986). Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view. Machine Learning 1(1), 47-80.
14. Shoham, Y., & Tennenholtz, M. (1994). Co-Learning and the evolution of social activity. Report No. CS-TR-94-1511. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
15. Sycara, K., & Lewis, M. (1990). Cooperative negotiation in concurrent engineering design. In Cooperative Engineering Design, 269-297. Springer-Verlag, New York.
16. Tan, M. (1993). Multi-agent reinforcement learning: Independent vs. cooperative agents. Workshop on Reinforcement Learning, Proc 10th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 330-337. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
17. Weiss, G. (1993). Learning to coordinate actions in multi-agent systems. IJCAI-93, Vol 1, 311-316.
18. Whitehead, S. (1991). A complexity analysis of cooperative mechanisms in reinforcement learning. AAAI-91, 607-613.