Physician-assisted suicide in the courts: Moral equivalence, double effect and clinical practice

Minnesota Law Review

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 939-

  Brody, Howard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE EUTHANASIA; ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; ASSISTED SUICIDE; BEHAVIOR; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; ETHICS; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MOTIVATION; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PASSIVE EUTHANASIA; PHYSICIAN; POLICY; RIGHT TO DIE; UNITED STATES; VACCO V. QUILL; WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; LEGAL APPROACH; VACCO V. QUILL; WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;

DOUBLE EFFECT; ETHICS; ETHICS, MEDICAL; EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE; EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE; HOMICIDE; HUMANS; INTENTION; JURISPRUDENCE; MOTIVATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; PHYSICIANS; PUBLIC POLICY; RIGHT TO DIE; SUICIDE, ASSISTED; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032048697     PISSN: 00265535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (1)

1. See Compassion in Dying v. Washington, 79 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc), rev'd sub nom. Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 2258 (1997); Quill v. Vacco, 80 F.3d 716 (2d Cir. 1996), rev'd, 117 S. Ct. 2293 (1997).