Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: Its implications for nonextraction treatment

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 141-146

  Stroud, J L ^a   English, J ^a   Buschang, Peter H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Caucasians; Enamel thickness; Interproximal reduction; Permanent dentition

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; ENAMEL; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BICUSPID; DENTAL ENAMEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MOLAR; OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; SERIAL EXTRACTION; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 0032041726     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Sheridan JJ. Air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 1985:19:43-49.
2. Peck H, Peck S. Reproximation (enamel stripping) as an essential orthodontic treatment ingredient. St. Louis: Mosby, 1975.
3. Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention, nine years in retrospect. Angle Orthod 1980;50:88-97,169-178.
4. Graziano V, Cumbo V, Messian P. Analisi statistica dei valori medi dei diametri mesiodistali, dello spressore dello smalto e della dentina nei denti permanenti. Stomat Medit 1984; 4: 3-20.
5. Alvesalo L, Tammisalo E, Townsend G. Upper central incisor and canine tooth crown size in 47, XXY males. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 1057-60.
6. Shillingburg HL, Grace CS. Thicknesses of enamel and dentin. J South Calif Dent Assoc 1973;41:33-52.
7. Stroud JL, Buschang PH, Goaz PW. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal dental and enamel thickness. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:169-171.
8. Scotti R, Villa L, Carossa S. Clinical applicability of the radiographic method for determining the thickness of calcified crown tissues. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:65-67.
9. Molnar S, Grantt D. Functional implications of primate enamel thickness. Am J Phys Anthropol 1977;46:447-54.
10. Messerman T. A concept of jaw function with a related clinical application. J Prosthet Dent, 1963;13:130-140.
11. Weinstein S. Minimal forces in tooth movements. Am J Orthod 1967;53:881-903.
12. Wolpoff MH. Interstitial wear. Am J Phys Anthropol 1971;34:205-228.
13. Parfitt G. Measurement of the physiological mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J Dent Res 1960;39:608-618.
14. Tuverson DL. Anterior interocclusal relations: Part 1, Am J Orthod, 1980;78:361-370.
15. Betteridge MA. The effects of interdental stripping on the labial segments evaluated one year out of retention. Brit J Orthod 1981;8:193-197.
16. Paskow, H. Self-alignment following interproximal stripping. Am J Orthod 1970: 240-249.
17. Hudson AL. A study of the effects of mesiodistal reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod 1956;42:615-624.
18. Radlanski RJ, Jager A, Schwestka R, Bertzbach F. Plaque accumulations caused by interdental stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:416-420.
19. Grain G, Sheridan JJ. Susceptibility to caries and periodontal disease after posterior air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:84-85.
20. Årtun J, Kokich VG. Long-term effect of root proximity on periodontal health after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987;91: 125-130.
21. Ramfjord SP, Ash MM. Occlusion. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1971.
22. Miethke RR, Behm-Menthel A. Correlations between lower incisor crowding and lower incisor position and later craniofacial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:231-239.
23. Begg PR, Kesling PC. The differential force method of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1977;71:1-39.
24. Sheridan JJ. Air-rotor stripping update. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:781-788.