How to deal with and judge the numerical results of risk analysis

Computers and Structures

Volumn 67, Issue 1-3, 1998, Pages 157-164

  Van Breugel, K ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; DECISION MAKING; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS);

RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0032041498     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7949(97)00167-3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Huppmann, H., Plenary panel discussion. 6th ICOSSAR, Vol. 1. 1993, pp. 57-59.
2. Ale, B. J. M., Risks and risk perception. Proc. of Symposium on Probabilistic Safety Technology. 1993, pp. 69-80 (in Dutch).
3. British Advisory Committee on Major Hazards, The Control of Major Hazards, 3rd report. Health and Safety Executive, London, 1984.
4. Melchers, R. E., Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction. John Wiley and Sons, 1985, p. 400.
5. v.d. Beukel, A., With other Eyes: About Science and the Search for Goals. Ten Have, Baarn, 1994, p. 227 (in Dutch).
6. Blockley, D. I., Engineering Safety. London, McGraw Hill, 1992.
7. Dutch constitution.
8. Mander, J. B., Elms, D. G., Quantitative risk assessment of large structural systems. 6th ICOSSAR, Vol. 3. 1993, pp. 1905-1912.
9. Reid, S. G., Acceptable risk. In Engineering Safety, ed. Blockley. McGraw-Hill, 1992, pp. 138-166.
10. Melchers, R. E., Society, tolerable risk and the ALARP principle. 6th ICOSSAR, Vol. 1. 1993, pp. 243-252.
11. Lind, N. C., Target reliability levels from social indicators. 6th ICOSSAR, Vol. 3. 1993, pp. 1897-1904.
12. Author, please supply reference.
13. Blockley, D. I., Business process engineering for safety. 15th. Int. Congress of IABSE. Copenhagen, 1996, pp. 665-676.
14. Jochum, Chr., Plenary panel discussion. 6th ICOSSAR, Vol. 1. 1993, pp. 59-61.
15. van Breugel, K., Acceptance criteria for high consequence risks: A critical appraisal. 6th ICOSSAR. Innsbruck, 1993, pp. 1849-1856.
16. Häfele, W., Energiesysteme im Uebergang. Landsberg/Lech. Poller AG and Co., Buchverlag, Häfele, 1990.
17. Berg, H. P., Grundler, D., Lange, F., Risk comparison: One way to risk evaluation. 6th ICOSSAR, Vol. 3. 1993, pp. 1847-1943.
18. Achterhuis, H., The measure of technique. AMBO. 1992, 272 p. (in Dutch).
19. Jonas, H., Des Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik fur die technologische Zivilisation. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. M, 1979.
20. Jangid R S. Seismic response of an asymmetric base isolated structure. Computers and Structures 1996;60(2):261-7.
21. Wang L, Grandhi R V. Safety index calculations using intervening variables for structural reliability analysis. Computers and Structures 1996;59(6):1139-48.
22. Babu S S, Bhattacharyya S K. Finite element analysis of fluid-structure interaction effect on liquid retaining structures due to sloshing. Computers and Structures 1996;59(6):1165-71.
23. Lee H P. Thermal stress analyses of a waste storage container. Computers and Structures 1996;61(2):197-224.