1. Is Ignorance Bliss? Could Jury Trial Survive Investigation?

Medicine, Science and the Law

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 98-106

  Smith, J C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; POLICY; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONFIDENTIALITY; CRIMINAL LAW; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 0032040610     PISSN: 00258024     EISSN: 20421818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002580249803800203     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Cooke A. (1950) A Generation on Trial. Rupert Hart Davis, p. 276.
2. Criminal Law Revision Committee (1968) Tenth Report: Secrecy of Jury Room. HMSO, Cmnd 3750.
3. Cross R. (1967) The behaviour of the jury — a review of the American evidence: a comment. Crim. LR. 575.
4. Lord Devlin (1956) Trial by Jury. Sweet & Maxwell pp. 46–7.
5. Devons E. (1965) Serving as a juryman in Britain. MLR. 28, 561.
6. Enright S. Morton J. (1990) Taking Liberties. The Criminal Jury in the 1990s. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, Ch 9.
7. Gibbons J. (1997) Explaining the verdict. NLJ. 147, 1454.
8. Kalven H. Zeisel H. (1966) The American Jury. Little Brown pp. 131–3.