Characteristics of anisometropic suppression: Simple reaction time measurements

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 491-502

  Pianta, Michael J ^a   Kalloniatis, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOMETROPIA; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; HUMAN; REACTION TIME;

ANISOMETROPIA; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0032040565     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206869     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. BIRCH, E. E., SHIMOJO, S., & HELD, R. (1985). Preferential looking assessment of fusion and stereopsis in infants ages 1-6 months. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science, 26, 366-370.
2. BLACKWELL, H. R. (1946). Contrast threshold of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 36, 624-643.
3. BLAKE, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Physiological Review, 96, 145-167.
4. BLAKE, R., & FOX, R. (1974). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687-692.
5. BURIAN, H. M., & VON NOORDEN, G. K. (1974). Binocular vision and ocular motility: Theory and management of strabismus. St Louis: Mosby.
6. CIUFFREDA, K. J., LEVI, D. M., & SELENOW, A. (1991). Amblyopia: Basic and clinical aspects. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
7. DUKE-ELDER, S., & WYBAR, K. (1973). Systems of ophthalmology (Vol. 6). London: Kimpton.
8. FLYNN, J. T. (1967). Spatial summation in amblyopia. Archives of Ophthalmology, 78, 470-474.
9. FOX, R., & CHECK, R. (1966). Binocular fusion: A test of the suppression theory. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 331-334.
10. FOX, R., & CHECK, R. (1968). Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 388-395.
11. FOX, R., TODD, S., & BETTINGER, L. A. (1975). Optokinetic nystagmus as an objective indicator of binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 15, 849-853.
12. FUORTES, M. G. F., GUNKEL, R. D., & RUSHTON, W. A. H. (1961). Increment thresholds in a subject deficient in cone vision. Journal of Physiology, 156, 179-192.
13. GRAHAM, C. H., & KEMP, E. H. (1938). Brightness discrimination as a function of the duration of the increment in intensity. Journal of General Physiology, 21, 635-650.
14. GROSVENOR, T. (1957). The effects of duration and background luminance upon the brightness discrimination of an amblyope. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 34, 634-663.
15. HAMASAKI, D. I., & FLYNN, J. T. (1981). Amblyopic eyes have longer reaction times. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science, 21, 846-853.
16. HARWERTH, R. S., BOLTZ, R. L., & SMITH, E. L., III (1980). Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient channels in the monkey visual system. Vision Research, 20, 15-22.
17. HARWERTH, R. S., & LEVI, D. M. (1978a). Reaction time as a measure of suprathreshold grating detection. Vision Research, 18, 1579-1586.
18. HARWERTH, R. S., & LEVI, D. M. (1978b). A sensory mechanism for amblyopia: Psychophysical studies. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 55, 151-162.
19. HERRICK, R. M. (1956). Foveal luminance discrimination as a function of the duration of the decrement or increment in luminance. Journal of Comparative Physiology & Psychology, 49, 437-443.
20. HOLOPIGIAN, K. (1989). Clinical suppression and binocular rivalry suppression: The effects of stimulus strength on the depth of suppression. Vision Research, 29, 1325-1333.
21. HOLOPIGIAN, K., BLAKE, R., & GREENWALD, M. (1988). Clinical suppression and amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science, 29, 444-451.
22. HUBEL, D. H., WIESEL, T. N., & LE VAY, S. (1975). Functional architecture of area 17 in normal and monocularly deprived macaque monkeys. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium Proceedings, 40, 581-589.
23. HUMPHRISS, D. (1959). Refraction by the Humphriss immediate contrast method. Optician, 138, 372-373.
24. HUMPHRISS, D. (1960). Refraction by immediate contrast. Optician, 139. 159-160.
25. HUMPHRISS, D. (1963). The refraction of binocular vision. Ophthalmic Optician, 3, 987-1001.
26. HUMPHRISS, D. (1982). The psychological septum: An investigation into its function. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 59, 639-641.
27. HUMPHRISS, D., & WOODRUFF, E. (1962). Refraction by immediate contrast. British Journal of Physiological Optics, 19, 15-20.
28. KALLONIATIS, M., & HARWERTH, R. S. (1990). Spectral sensitivity and adaptation characteristics of cone mechanisms under white-light adaptation. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7, 1912-1928.
29. KALLONIATIS, M., & HARWERTH, R. S. (1991). Effects of chromatic adaptation on opponent interactions in monkey increment-threshold spectral sensitivity functions. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8, 1818-1831.
30. KELLER, M. (1941). The relation between the critical duration and intensity in brightness discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 407-418.
31. KOHFELD, D. L., SANTEE, J. L., & WALLACE, N. D. (1981a). Loudness and reaction time: I. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 535-549.
32. KOHFELD, D. L., SANTEE, J. L., & WALLACE, N. D. (1981b). Loudness and reaction time: II. Identification of detection components at different intensities and frequencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 550-562.
33. LEHKY, S. R. (1988). An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception, 17, 215-228.
34. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.
35. LEVI, D. M., HARWERTH, R. S., & MANNY, R. E. (1979). Suprathreshold spatial frequency detection and binocular interaction in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science, 18, 714-725.
36. LOSHIN, D. S.,& JONES, R. (1982). Contrast sensitivity as a function of exposure duration in the amblyopic visual system. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 59, 561-567.
37. LUCE, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. MACKENSON, G. (1958). Reaktionszeitmessungen bei Amblyopie [Reaction time in amblyopia]. Graefe's Archives of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 159, 636-648.
39. MANSFIELD, R. J. W. (1973). Latency functions in human vision. Vision Research, 13, 2219-2234.
40. MILLER, E. F. (1955). The nature and cause of impaired vision in the amblyopic eye of a squinter. American Journal of Optometry, 32, 10-18.
41. NYGAARD, R. W., & FRUMKES, T. E. (1982). Calibration of the retinal illuminance provided by Maxwellian views. Vision Research, 22, 433-434.
42. O'SHEA, R. P. (1987). Chronometric analysis supports fusion rather than suppression theory of binocular vision. Vision Research, 27, 781-791.
43. O'SHEA, R. P., & CRASSINI, B. (1981). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques. Perception, 10, 283-293.
44. PIÉRON, H. (1914). Recherches sur les lois de variation des temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensités excitatrices [Research into the variation of sensory latency as a function of intensity]. L'Année Physiologique, 20, 17-96.
45. PIÉRON, H. (1920). Nouvelles recherches sur l'analyse du temps de latence sensorielle et sur la loi qui relie le temps à l'intensité d'excitation [New research on the analysis of sensory latency and how it varies with intensity]. L'Année Physiologique, 22, 58-142.
46. PUGH, M. (1954). Foveal vision in amblyopia. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 38, 321-331.
47. ROUFS, J. A. J. (1972). Dynamic properties of vision: I. Experimental relationships between flicker and flash thresholds. Vision Research, 12, 261-278.
48. SCHOR, C. M., LANDSMAN, L., & ERICKSON, P. (1987). Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 64, 723-730.
49. SCHOR, C. M., TERRELL, M., & PETERSON, D. (1976). Contour interaction and temporal masking in strabismus and amblyopia. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 53, 217-223.
50. SHIMOJO, S., BAUER, J., O'CONNELL, K. M., & HELD, R. (1986). Prestereopic binocular fusion in infants. Vision Research, 26, 501-510.
51. SIMPSON, T. (1991). The suppression effect of simulated anisometropia. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 11, 350-358.
52. SIMPSON, T. (1992). Monocular acuity in the presence and absence of fusion. Optometry & Vision Science, 69, 405-410.
53. SIMPSON, T., SMITH, E. L., III, HARWERTH, R. S., & KALLONIATIS, M. (1990). Spectral sensitivity of induced anisometropic suppression. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science (Suppl.), 31, 94.
54. UENO, T. (1977). Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels. Vision Research, 17, 227-232.
55. UENO, T. (1978). Temporal summation in human vision: Simple reaction time measurements. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 43-50.
56. VON NOORDEN, G. K. (1961). Reaction time in normal and amblyopic eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology, 66, 695-701.
57. VON NOORDEN, G. K., & LEFFLER, M. B. (1966). Visual acuity in strabismus amblyopia under monocular and binocular conditions. Archives of Ophthalmology, 76, 172-177.
58. WALES, R., & FOX, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 90-94.
59. WALKER, P. (1975). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 467-473.
60. WATSON, A. B. (1986). Temporal sensitivity. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 6-1 to 6-43). New York: Wiley.
61. WEBER, A. I. (1988). Ricco's area and resolution in the human visual system. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Houston.
62. WOLFE, J. M., & OWENS, D. A. (1979). Evidence for separable binocular processes differentially affected by artificially induced anisometropia. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 56, 279-284.