Theories of artifact categorization

Cognition

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 87-93

  Bloom, Paul ^a,b  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LOGIC; MATERIALS; MOTIVATION; NOTE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

CLASSIFICATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; LOGIC; MANUFACTURED MATERIALS; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032037891     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Beal, C.R., Flavell, J., 1984. Demonstration of the ability to distinguish communicative information and literal message meaning. Child Development 55, 920-928.
2. Bloom, P., 1996. Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition 60, 1-29.
3. Bloom, P., Markson, L., 1998. Intentionality and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, in press.
4. Dennett, D., 1990. The interpretation of texts, people, and other artifacts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50, 177-194.
5. Frith, U., Happé, F., 1994. Language and communication in autistic disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 346, 97-104.
6. Gelman, S.A., Markman, E.M., 1986. Categories and induction in young children. Cognition 23, 183-208.
7. Gibbs, R.W., 1983. Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 524-533.
8. Grice, H.P., 1975. Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, S.L. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. Academic Press, New York.
9. Keil, F.C., 1989. Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Malt, B.C., Johnson, F.C., 1992. Do artifact concepts have cores?. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 195-217.
11. Malt, B.C., Johnson, F.C., 1998. Artifact category membership and the intentional-history theory. Cognition 66, 79-85.
12. Malt, B.C., Sloman, S.A., 1995. Evaluating theories of artifact naming. 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
13. Murphy, G.L., 1993. Theories and concept formation. In: Van Mechelen, I., Hampton, J., Michalski, R., Theuns, P. (Eds.), Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis. Academic Press, New York.
14. Sperber, D., Wilson, D., 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.