Heterogeneity in the Relationship between the Time Tradeoff and Short Form-36 for HIV-Infected and Primary Care Patients

Medical Care

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 523-532

  Bult, Jan Roelf ^a   Hunink, Maria G M ^b,d   Tsevat, Joel ^c   Weinstein, Milton C ^b  

^a Monitor United States   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Health status measure; Health utility measure; Heterogeneity; Latent class analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; MALE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL VALUES; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032036332     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199804000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986;5:1.
2. Revicki DA, Kaplan RM. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993;2:477.
3. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res 1972;7;118.
4. Mooney G. Key issues in health economics. Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.
5. Revicki DA. Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures. Med Care 1992;30(suppl):MS274.
6. Revicki DA, Weinstein M, Alderman M, et al. Health utility and health status outcomes of antihypertensive treatment. Washington, DC: Battelle Medical Technology Assessment and Policy Research Center, 1992.
7. Tsevat J, Slozan JG, Kuntz KM. Health values of HIV-infected patients: Relationship to mental health and physical functioning. Med Care 1996;34:44.
8. Fryback DG, Dasbach EJ, Klein R, et al. Predicting quality of well-being scores from the SF-36: Results from the Beaver Dam health outcome study. Med Dec Making 1997;17:1.
9. Bult JR, Bosch JL, Hunink MGM. Heterogeneity in the relationship between the standard gamble utility measure and health status dimensions. Med Dec Making 1996;16:226.
10. Tsevat J. Methods for assessing health-related quality of life in HIV-infected patients. Psychology and Health 1994;9:19.
11. Tsevat J, Dawson NV, Matchar DB. Assessing quality of life and preferences in the seriously ill using utility theory. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:73S.
12. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473.
13. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247.
14. DeSarbo WS, Cron WL. A maximum likelihood methodology for clusterwise linear regression. Psychometrika 1988;54:707.
15. DeSoete G, DeSarbo WS. A latent class probit model for analyzing pick any/n data. J Classification 1991;8:45.
16. Kass GV. Significance testing in, and some extensions of, automatic interaction detection. Doctoral dissertation, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
17. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin PB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM-algorithm, J Royal Statistical Society 1977;B39:1.
18. Akaike H. A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974;AC-19:716.
19. Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health status. Operations Research 1982;30:1043.
20. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199.