Molecular level investigation of exocytosis in cultured human pheochromocytoma cells: Insights from high resolution scanning electron microscopy combined with autoradiogram and cytochemistry

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 295-301

  Lee, Ying Shiung ^a,b   Chou, Yun Ying ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATECHOLAMINE;

ADRENAL TUMOR; ARTICLE; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; CELL CULTURE; EXOCYTOSIS; HUMAN; MEMBRANE FUSION; PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SECRETION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADRENAL GLAND NEOPLASMS; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; CATECHOLAMINES; EXOCYTOSIS; HUMANS; MEMBRANE FUSION; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;

EID: 0032034837     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Almen W, Exocytosis. Ann Rev Physiol 1990; 32:607.
2. Monck JR, Fernandez JM. The exoeytotic fusion pore. J Cell Biol 1992; 119:1395.
3. Omberg RL, Reese TS. Beginning of exocytosis captured by rapid freezing of Limulus amebocytes. J Cell Biol 1981; 90:40.
4. Schmidt W, Patzak W, Lingg G, et al. Membrane events in adrenal chromaffin cells during exocytosis: a freeze-etching analysis after rapid cryofixation. Eur J Cell Biol 1983; 32:31.
5. Chandler DE. Membrane fusion as seen in rapidly frozen secretory cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992; 635:234.
6. Merkle CJ, Chandler DE. Visualization of exocytosis by quick-freezing and freeze-fracture. Methods Enzymol 1993; 221:112.
7. Curran M, Cohen FS, Chandler DE, et al. Exocytotic fusion pores exhibit semistable state. J Membr Biol 1993; 133:61.
8. Jaques Jr S, Tobes MC. Morphological and biochemical variability of tissue and cultured cell from human pheochromocytoma. J Cell Physiol 1986; 128:261.
9. Davis GC, Kissinger FT, Shoup RE. Strategies for determination of serum or plasma norepinephrine by reverse-phase liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 1981; 53:156.
10. Schneider AS, Cline HT, Rosenheck K, et al. Stimulus-secretion coupling in isolated adrenal chromaffin cells: calcium channel activation and possible role of cytoskeletal elements. J Neurochem 1981; 37:567.
11. Morris JJ, Pow DV. Capturing and quantifying the exocytotic event. J Exp Biol 1988; 139:81.
12. Hirano M, Suzuki T, Goto M, et al. Observation of biological specimen fixed and conductive-stained by tannin ferrocyanide-OsO4 method. Hitachi Tech Data SEM 1991; 49:1.
13. Suzuki H, Mizuhira V. Three dimensional observation of the radioactive concanavalin A receptors on the surface of human red blood corpuscles utilizing scanning electron microscope autoradiography. Acta Histochem Cytochem 1982; 15:624.
14. Bouteille M. The LIGOP method for routine ultrastructure autoradiography: a combination of single grid coating, gold latensification and phenidon development. J Microsc Biol Cell 1976; 27:121.
15. Robinson JM, Kamovsky MJ. Evaluation of the polyene antibiotic filipin as a cytochemical probe for membrane cholesterol. J Histochem Cytochem 1980; 28:161.
16. Zimmberg J, Curran M, Cohen FS. A lipid/protein complex hypothesis for exocytotic fusion pore formation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1991; 635:307.
17. Nannavati C, Markin VS, Oberhauser A, et al. The exocy- totic fusion pore as a protein-supported lipidic structure. Biophys J 1992; 63:1118.
18. Neher E, Marty A. Discrete changes of cell membrane capacitance observed under conditions of enhanced secretion in bovine adrenal chromaffin Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1982; 79:6712.
19. Fermandez JM, Neher E, Gomperts BD. Capacitance measurements reveal stepwise fusion events in degranulating mast cells. Nature (London) 1984; 312:453.
20. Horwitz AF, Wright A, Ludwig P, et al. Interrelated lipid alterations and their influence on the proliferation and fusion of cultured myogenic cells. J Cell Biol 1978; 77:334.
21. Lucy JA. Mechanism of chemically induced fusion. Cell Surf Rev 1978; 8:215.
22. While J, Helenius A. pH-Dependent fusion between the Semliki forest virus membrane and liposomes. Proc Nad Acad Sci U S A 1980; 77:3273.
23. Maeda T, Kawasaki K, Ohnishi SI. Interaction of influenza virus hemagglutinin with target membrane lipids is a key step in virusinduced heinoiysis and fusion at pH 5.2. Proc Nail Acad Sci U S A 1981; 78:4133.
24. White J, Kartenbeck J, Helenius A. Membrane fusion activity of influenza virus. EMBO J 1982; 1:217.
25. Hsu MC, Scheid A, Choppin PW. Fusion of Sendai virus with liposomes: dependence on the viral fusion protein (F) and the lipid composition of liposomes. Virology 1983; 145:361.
26. Eidelman O, Schlegel R, Tralka TS, et al. pH-Dependent fusion induced by vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. J Biol Chem 1984; 259:4622.
27. Haywood AM, Boyer BP. Effect of lipid composition upon fusion of liposomes with Sendai virus membranes. Biochemistry 1984; 23:4161.
28. Miyake K, McNeil PL. Vesicle accumulation and exocytosis at sites of plasma membrane disruption. J Cell Biol 1995; 131:1737.
29. Bi GQ, Alderton JM, Steinhardt RA. Calcium-regulated exocytosis is required for cell membrane resealing. J Cell Biol 1995; 131:1747.