Military buildups, war, and realpolitik: A multivariate model

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 156-175

  Sample, Susan G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032034279     PISSN: 00220027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022002798042002002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altfeld, Michael F. 1983. Arms races? And escalation? A comment on Wallace. International Studies Quarterly 27:225-31.
2. Bremer, Stuart A. 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36:309-41.
3. Brodie, Bernard, ed. 1946. The absolute weapon. New York: Harcourt Brace.
4. Diehl, Paul F. 1983. Arms races and escalation: A closer look. Journal of Peace Research 20:205-12.
5. _. 1985. Arms races to war: Testing some empirical linkages. Sociological Quarterly 26:331-49.
6. _. 1992. What are they fighting for? The importance of issues in international conflict research. Journal of Peace Research 29:333-44.
7. Diehl, Paul F., and Mark J. C. Crescenzi. 1998. Reconfiguring the arms race-war debate. Journal of Peace Research 35 (1), forthcoming.
8. Fearon, James D. 1994. Signaling versus the balance of power and interests: An empirical test of a crisis bargaining model. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38:236-69.
9. George, Alexander, and Richard Smoke. 1974. Deterrence in American foreign policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. George, Jim. 1994. Discourses of global politics: A critical (re)introduction to international relations (Critical Perspectives on World Politics series, edited by R.B.J. Walker). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
11. Gochman, Charles S., and Russell J. Leng. 1983. Realpolitik and the road to war: An analysis of attributes and behavior. International Studies Quarterly 27:97-120.
12. Gochman, Charles S., and Zeev Maoz. 1984. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:585-616.
13. Goertz, Gary, and Paul Diehl. 1993. Enduring rivalries: Theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. International Studies Quarterly 37:147-171.
14. _. 1995. The "volcano model" and other patterns in the evolution of enduring rivalries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago, February.
15. Hensel, Paul R., and Sara MCLaughlin. 1996. Power transitions and dispute escalation in evolving interstate rivalries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August.
16. Holsti, Kalevi J. 1991. Peace and war: Armed conflicts and international order 1648-1989. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Horn, Michael Dean. 1987. Arms races and the international system. Ph.D. diss., University of Rochester.
18. Huntington, Samuel P. 1958. Arms races: Prerequisites and results. Public Policy 8:41-86.
19. Huth, Paul, and Bruce Russett. 1984. What makes deterrence work? Cases from 1900 to 1980. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36:496-526.
20. Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Khong, Yuen Foong. 1992. Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decision of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Kremenyuk, Victor A. 1994. The cold war as cooperation. In From rivalry to cooperation: Russian and American perspectives on the post-cold war era, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky, John A. Vasquez, and Peter V. Gladkov, 3-25. New York: HarperCollins.
23. Kugler, Jacek. 1984. Terror without deterrence: Reassessing the role of nuclear weapons. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:470-506.
24. Lebow, Richard Ned. 1985. Conclusions. In Psychology and deterrence, edited by Robert Jervis, Richard Ned Lebow, and Janice Gross Stein. 203-32. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Mansbach, Richard W., and John A. Vasquez. 1981. In search of theory: A new paradigm for global politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
26. Midlarsky, Manus I. 1994. Polarity, the learning of cooperation, and the stability of international systems. In From rivalry to cooperation: Russian and American perspectives on the post-cold war era, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky, John A. Vasquez, and Peter V. Gladkov, 26-39. New York: HarperCollins.
27. Mueller, John. 1993. The essential irrelevance of nuclear weapons. In The cold war and after: Prospects for peace, edited by Sean M. Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller, rev. ed., 45-69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Organski, A.F.K. 1958. World politics. New York: Knopf.
29. Organski, A.F.K., and Jacek Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Ostrom, Charles W. Jr. 1977. Evaluating alternative foreign policy decision-making models. Journal of Conflict Resolution 21:235-66.
31. _. 1978. A reactive linkage model of the U.S. defense expenditure policymaking process. American Political Science Review 72:941 -57.
32. Richardson, Lewis F. 1960. Arms and insecurity. Pacific Grove, CA: Boxwood.
33. Russett, B nice M. 1983. The prisoners of insecurity. San Francisco: Freeman.
34. Sample, Susan G. 1996. Arms races and the escalation of disputes to war. Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University.
35. _. 1997a. Arms races and dispute escalation: Resolving the debate. Journal of Peace Research 34:7-22.
36. _. 1997b. Military buildups as a Correlate of War. Paper prepared for the Norman Thomas Lecture Series (Conference on the Scientific Study of War), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, March.
37. _. 1998. Furthering the investigation into the effects of arms buildups. Journal of Peace Research 35 (1), forthcoming.
38. Singer, J. David. 1991. Peace in the global system: Displacement, interregnum, or transformation? In The long postwar peace: Contending explanations and projections, edited by Charles W. Kegley Jr., 56-84. New York: HarperCollins.
39. Small, Melvin, and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40. Vasquez, John A. 1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. _. 1995. Why do neighbors fight? Proximity, interaction, or territoriality? Journal of Peace Research 32:277-93.
42. Vasquez, John A., and Marie T. Henehan. 1992. Editors' commentary on "arms races and escalation: A closer look" by Paul Diehl. In The scientific study of peace and war: A text reader, edited by John A. Vasquez and Marie T. Henehan, 103-8. New York: Lexington Books.
43. Wallace, Michael. 1979. Arms races and escalation: Some new evidence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 23:3-16.
44. _. 1980. Some persisting findings: A reply to Professor Weede. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24:289-92.
45. _. 1982. Armaments and escalation: Two competing hypotheses. International Studies Quarterly 26:37-56.
46. _. 1983. Arms races and escalation: A reply to Altfeld. International Studies Quarterly 27:233-35.
47. _. 1990. Racing redux : The arms race-escalation debate revisited. In Prisoners of war? Nation-states in the modern era, edited by Charles S. Gochman and Alan Ned Sabrosky, 115-22. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
48. Ward, Michael D. 1984. Differential paths to parity: A study of the contemporary arms race. American Political Science Review 78:297-317.
49. Wayman, Frank Whelon. 1996. Power shifts and the onset of war. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of The War Ledger, edited by Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke, 145-62. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
50. Weede, Erich. 1980. Arms races and escalation: Some persisting doubts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24:285-87.
51. Werner, Suzanne, and Jacek Kugler. 1996. Power transitions and military buildups: Resolving the relationship between arms buildups and war. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of The War Ledger, edited by Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke, 187-210. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.