Biomechanical aspects of the subarachnoid space and cervical cord in healthy individuals examined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging

Spine

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 556-567

  Muhle, Claus ^a   Wiskirchen, Jakub ^a   Weinert, Dieter ^a   Falliner, Axel ^a   Wesner, Frank ^a   Brinkmann, Gisbert ^a   Heller, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics of cervical spine; Cervical motion; Cervical spine; Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; CERVICAL SPINAL CORD; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; JOINT STABILITY; MALE; MYELOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOGENESIS; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUBARACHNOID SPACE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MYELOGRAPHY; NECK MUSCLES; OBSERVER VARIATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL CORD; SUBARACHNOID SPACE;

EID: 0032033636     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00008     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arnold JG. Spondylochondrosis of the cervical spine. Ann Surg 1955;14:872-83.
2. Breig A. Biomechanics of the Central Nervous System. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1961:1-147.
3. Dvorak J, Froehlich D, Penning L, Baumgartner H, Panjabi MM. Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: flexion/extension. Spine 1988;13:748-55.
4. Elliott HC. Cross-sectional diameters and areas of the human spinal cord. Anat Rec 1945;93:287-93.
5. Epstein NE, Hyman RA, Epstein JA, Rosenthal AD. Dynamic MRI scanning of the cervical spine. Spine 1988;13: 937-8.
6. Gooding MR. Pathogenesis of myelopathy in cervical spondylosis. Lancet 1974;2:1180-1.
7. Holmes A, Han ZH, Dang GT, Chen ZQ, Wang ZG, Fang J. Changes in cervical canal spinal volume during in vitro flexion-extension. Spine 1996;21:1313-9.
8. Jirout J. The mobility of the cervical spinal cord under normal conditions. Br J Radiol 1959;32:744-51.
9. Key A, Retzius G. Studien in der Anatomie des Nervensystems und des Bindegewebes. Stockholm: Norstedt & Söner, 1875:1-124.
10. Koschorek F, Jensen HP, Terwey B. Dynamic evaluation of cervical spinal cord by magnetic resonance imaging: Improvement of indication for surgical treatment of chronic cervical myelopathy. Magn Reson Imaging 1986;4:421-4.
11. Lowman RM, Finkelstein A. Air myelography for demonstration of the cervical cord. Radiology 1942;39:700-9.
12. Malinowsky K. Massbestimmungen am Wirbelkanal: Lage der einzelnen Teile und sonstigen Verhältnisse desselben. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche 1910: 249-85.
13. Muhle C, Wiskirchen J, Brossmann J, Emde LP, Heller M. Functional diagnostics of the cervical spine with use of MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193(Suppl):340.
14. Nordqvist L. The sagittal diameter of the spinal cord and subarachnoidal space in different age groups. Acta Radiol Scand Suppl 1964;227:1-96.
15. Nugent GR. Clinicopathologic correlations in cervical spondylosis. Neurology 1959;9:273-9.
16. O'Connell JE. Involvement of the cervical cord by intervertebral disk protrusions. Br J Surg 1955;43:225-47.
17. Penning L. Functioneel Rontgenonderzoek Bij Degenerative en Traumatische Afwijkingen der Laag-Cervicale Bewegingsegmenten (Thesis). The Netherlands: University of Gronikge, 1960;1-154.
18. Penning L, van der Zwaag P. Biomechanical aspects of spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Radiol 1966;5:1090-103.
19. Penning L. Normal movements of the cervical spine. Am J Roentgenol 1978;130:317-26.
20. Russell EJ. Cervical disk disease. Radiology 1990;177: 313-25.
21. Simpson G, Roe A, Lewontin R. Quantitative Zoology. 1st Edition. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co, 1960:1-440.