A PC-based workstation for real-time acquisition, processing, and display of electromyogram signals

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 123-134

  Clancy, Edward A ^a,b  

^a LIBERTY MUTUAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SAFETY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; ESTIMATION; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; SENSORS; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

ELECTROMYOGRAM SIGNALS; REAL TIME ACQUISITION;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DISPLAY SYSTEM; ELECTROMYOGRAM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ALGORITHMS; AMPLIFIERS; ANALOG-DIGITAL CONVERSION; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATA DISPLAY; ELECTRODES; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MICROCOMPUTERS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 0032031998     PISSN: 08998205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Sounders JB de CM, Feinstein B, Wright EW Jr. Relation of human electromyogram to muscular tension. EEG Clin Neurophysiol. 1952;4:187-94.
2. Kaiser E, Petersen I. Adaptive filter for EMG control signals. In: The Control of Upper-Extremity Prostheses and Orthoses. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1974;54-7.
3. Harba MIA, Lynn PA. Optimizing the acquisition and processing of surface electromyographic signals. J Biomed Eng. 1981;3:100-6.
4. Hogan N, Mann RW. Myoelectric signal processing: optimal estimation applied to electromyography, Part I: Derivation of the optimal myoprocessor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1980;27 (7):382-95.
5. Hogan N, Mann RW. Myoelectric signal processing: optimal estimation applied to electromyography, Part II: Experimental demonstration of optimal myoprocessor performance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1980;27(7):396-410.
6. D'Alessio T. Some results on the optimization of a digital processor for surface EMG signals. Electromyog Clin Neurophysiol. 1984;24:625-43.
7. Filligoi GC, Mandarini P. Some theoretic results on a digital EMG signal processor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1984;31: 333-41.
8. Clancy EA, Hogan N. Single site electromyograph amplitude estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1994;41:159-67.
9. Murray WR, Ralph WD III. An optimal real-time digital processor for the electric activity of muscle. Med Instrum. 1985;19(2):77-82.
10. Thusneyapan S, Zahalak GI. A practical electrode-array myoprocessor for surface electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1989;36:295-9.
11. Clancy EA, Hogan N. Multiple site electromyograph amplitude estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;41: 203-11.
12. Emerson ND, Zahalak GI. Longitudinal electrode arrays for electromyography. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1981;19:504-6.
13. D'Alessio T. Analysis of a digital EMG signal processor in dynamic conditions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985;32: 78-82.
14. Meek SG, Fetherston SJ. Comparison of signal-to-noise ratio of myoelectric filters for prosthesis control. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1992;29:9-20.
15. Park E, Meek SG. Adaptive filter of the electromyographic signal of prosthetic control and force estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42:1048-52.
16. Jerard RB, Williams TW, Ohlenbusch CW. Practical design of an EMG controlled above elbow prosthesis. Proceedings of the 1974 Conference on Engineering Devices in Rehabilitation, Boston, MA. 1974:73-7.
17. Jacobsen S, Knutti DF, Hohnson RT, Sears HH. Development of the Utah artificial arm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1982;29:249-69.
18. Clancy E. EMG amplitude estimation with adaptive smoothing window length. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago, IL. 1997;19:1271-4.