Psychophysics of reading. XVII. Low-vision performance with four types of electronically magnified text

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 183-190

  Harland, Stephen ^a   Legge, Gordon E ^a   Luebker, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Low vision; Magnifier; Page navigation; Reading

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY DEVICES; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL EQUIPMENT; EYE MOVEMENTS; OPTICAL DEVICES; VISION AIDS;

CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CCTV) METHOD; MAGNIFIERS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RAPID SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION (RSVP);

VISION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; READING; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TELEVISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTRONICS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; READING; SENSORY AIDS; VISION, LOW; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0032030996     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199803000-00023     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Beckmann PJ, Legge GE. Psychophysics of reading. XIV. The page navigation problem in using magnifiers. Vision Res 1996;36:3723-33.
2. Legge GE, Pelli DG, Rubin GS, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Res 1985;25:239-52.
3. Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, LaMay JM. Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:843-53.
4. Rubin GS, Turano K. Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 1992;32:895-902.
5. Rubin GS, Turano K. Low vision reading with sequential word presentation. Vision Res 1994;34:1723-33.
6. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading. II. Low vision. Vision Res 1985;25:253-65.
7. Legge GE, Ross JA, Isenberg LM, LaMay JM. Psychophysics of reading. XII. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:677-87.
8. Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:54-65.
9. Fine EM, Peli E. Scrolled and RSVP texts are read at similar rates by the visually impaired. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1995;12:2286-92.
10. Carver RP. Reading Rate: A Review of Research and Theory. San Diego: Academic Press, 1990.
11. McCall WA, Crabbs LM. Standard Test Lessons in Reading. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1950.