Geophysical application of a new surface integral equation method for EM modeling

Geophysics

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 411-423

  Liu, Eric H ^a   Lamontagne, Yves ^a  

^a Lamontagne Geophysics Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORIES; GREEN'S FUNCTION; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

SURFACE INTEGRAL EQUATIONS (SIE);

ELECTROMAGNETIC PROSPECTING;

ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD;

EID: 0032029630     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444341     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, W. L., 1975, Improved digital filters for evaluating Fourier and Hankel transform integrals: Nat. Tech. Inf. Serv. rep. PB-242-800.
2. Bouix, M., 1966, Les discountinuités du rayonnement électromagnétique: Dunod.
3. Colton, D., and Kress, R., 1983, Integral equation methods in scattering theory: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4. Doherty, J. E., 1987, The use of surface integral equations in modeling for electrical prospecting: Ph.D thesis, Univ. of Queensland.
5. Hannesson, J. E., and West, G. F., 1984, The horizontal loop electromagnetic response of a thin plate in a conductive earth: Part 2 - Computational results and examples: Geophysics, 49, 421-432.
6. Harrington, R. F., 1968, Field computation by moment methods: Macmillan Publ. Co.
7. Hohmann, G. W., 1975, Three-dimensional induced polarization and electromagnetic modeling: Geophysics, 40, 309-324.
8. Lajoie, J. J., and West, G. F., 1976, The electromagnetic response of a conductive inhomogeneity in a layered earth: Geophysics, 41, 1133-1156.
9. Liu, E. H., and Lamontagne, Y., 1996, Three-dimensional electromagnetic field computation by the multiscalar boundary element method: Rad. Sci., 31, 423-435.
10. _ 1998. Electromagnetic modeling using surface integral equations, in Oristaglio, M., and Spies, B., Eds., Three-dimensional electromagnetics: Soc. Expl. Geophys. (scheduled for publication in Fall 1998).
11. Liu, E. H., and Sidaway, E., 1996, Maxwell's equations and boundary conditions in curvilinear coordinate systems: Lamontagne Geophys. Res. Rep. 96-01.
12. Macnae, J., 1985, Manual of large loop EM interpretation: Lamontagne Geophys. Int. Rep. KC3.
13. Müller, C., 1969, Foundations of the mathematical theory of electromagnetic waves: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
14. Newman, G. A., Hohmann, G. W., and Anderson, W. L., 1986, Transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a layered earth: Geophysics, 51, 1608-1627.
15. Parry, J. R., and Ward, S. H., 1971, Electromagnetic scattering from cylinders of arbitrary cross-section in a conductive half-space: Geophysics, 36, 67-100.
16. Poggio, A. J., and Miller, E. K., 1973, Integral equation solutions of 3D scattering problems, in Mittra, R., Ed., Computer techniques for electromagnetics: Pergamon Press, Inc.
17. Raiche, A. P., 1974, An integral equation approach to 3D modeling: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 36, 363-376.
18. SanFilipo, W. A., and Hohmann, G. W., 1985, Integral equation solution for the transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a conductive half-space: Geophysics, 50, 798-809.
19. Weidelt, P., 1975, Electromagnetic induction in three-dimensional structures: J. Geophys., 41, 85-109.
20. Won, I. J., and Kuo, J. X. 1975a, Representation theorems for multiregional electrodynamic diffraction: part I, theory: J. Geophys., 40, 96-108.
21. _ 1975b, Representation theorems for multiregional electrodynamic diffraction: part II, applications: J. Geophys., 40, 109-119.