Revocation of conditional release: A comparison of individual and program characteristics across four U.S. States

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 177-186

  Callahan, Lisa A ^a   Silver, Eric ^b  

^a Russell Sage College   (United States)

^b Policy Research Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; COURT; CRIME; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HAZARD; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

EID: 0032029550     PISSN: 01602527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-2527(98)00011-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Albonetti, C. A., & Hepburn, J. R. (1997). Probation revocation: A proportional hazard model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage. Social Problems, 44 (1), 124-138.
2. Baxstrom v. Herald, 383 U.S. 107 (1966).
3. Bloom, J. D., & Williams, M. H. (1994). Management and treatment of insanity acquittees: A model for the 1990s. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
4. Bolton v. Harris, 395 F.2D 642 (1968).
5. Callahan, L. A., Mayer, C., & Steadman, H. J. (1985). Insanity defense reform in the United States - Post-Hinckley. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 11 (1), 54-59.
6. Callahan, L. A., & Silver, E. (1998). Factors associated with the conditional release of persons acquitted by reason of insanity: A decision tree approach. Law and Human Behavior, 22 (2), 147-163.
7. Callahan, L. A., Steadman, H. J., McGreevy, M. A., & Robbins, P. C. (1991). The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: An eight-state study. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 19 (4), 331-338.
8. Foucha v. Louisiana, 563 So.2D 1138 (1992).
9. Hendricks v. Kansas, No. 95-1649 (1997).
10. Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. 354 (1983).
11. Lamb, H. R., Weinberger, L. E., & Gross, B. H. (1988). Court-mandated community outpatient treatment for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity: A five-year follow-up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145 (4), 450-456.
12. McGreevy, M. A., Steadman, H. J., Dvoskin, J. A., & Dollard, N. (1991). New York State's system of managing insanity acquittees in the community. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42 (5), 512-517.
13. Steadman, H. J., & Cocozza, J. J. (1974). Careers of the criminally insane. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
14. Tellefsen, C., Cohen, M. I., Silver, S. B., & Dougherty, C. (1992). Predicting success on conditional release for insanity acquittees: Regionalized versus nonregionalized hospital patients. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law, 20 (1), 87-100. United States v. Hinckley, 672 F.2D 115 (D.C. Cir. 1982).
15. Wiederanders, M. R., Bromley, D. L., & Choate, P. A. (1997). Forensic conditional release programs and outcomes in three states. International journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20 (2), 249-257.
16. Wilson, D., Tien, G., & Eaves, D. (1995). Increasing the community tenure of mentally disordered offenders: An assertive case management program. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18 (1), 61-69.