Transferring technology: costs and benefits

Technology in Society

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 99-112

  Jensen, O W ^a   Scheraga, C A ^a  

^a FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 0032028955     PISSN: 0160791X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-791X(97)00031-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Schumpeter, JA. The theory of economic development (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1934).
2. Rumelt, RP, Schendel D, Teece D. (eds.). Fundamental issues in strategy: a research agenda (Harvard Business School Press: Boston, 1994).
3. Mueller, D. "Persistent performance among large corporations," in L. G. Thomas (ed.). The economics of strategic planning: essays in honor of Joel Dean (Lexington Books: Lexington, 1986).
4. Nelson, RR. "Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?," in Rumelt, Schendal, and Teece (eds.), Fundamental isues in strategy (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994). Interestingly, Nelson acknowledges that the differences among firms may disappear within a short time after a superior technology is introduced. This outcome occurs because the market is not only selecting a technology but also a set of capabilities and the strategy that brought these capabilities into existence, thus ensuring that only firms with similar productive capabilities remain.
5. Nelson, R, Winter, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982).
6. Tushman ML, Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 1986;31:0.
7. Schmookler, J. "The size of firm and the growth of knowledge," in Z. Griliches and L. Hurwitz (eds.), Patents, invention and economic change (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972).
8. Pucik, V. "Technology transfer in strategic alliances: competitive collaboration and organizational learning." in Agmon and Von Glinow (eds.). Technology transfer in international business. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).
9. Porter, ME. "The technological dimension of competitive strategy," Research on technological innovation, management and policy (Greenwich: JAI Press, 1983).
10. Comanor, WS. "Market structure, product differentiation, and industrial research," Quarterly journal of economics (November, 1967).
11. Stewart, CT. Nihei, Y. Technology transfer and human factors (Lexington: Lexington Books, 1987).
12. Yoffie, DB. (ed.), "From comparative advantage to regulated competition," Beyond free trade: firms, government, and global competition (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1993).
13. Aharoni, Y. "Education and technology transfer: the recipient point of view," in Lundstedt and Colglazier (eds.). Managing innovation: the social dimensions of creativity, invention, and technology (New York: Pergamon Press, 1982).
14. Marton, K. Multinationals, technology, and industrialization: implications and impact in third world countries, (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1986).
15. Rogers, EM. Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edition. (New York: The Free Press, 1983).
16. Mansfield, E. Technological change (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971).
17. Gruber, WH. "The development and utilization of technology in industry," in Gruber and Marquis (eds.). Factors in the transfer of technology (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1969). It did not pass Gruber's notice that while the empirical findings showed a relationship between the size of the firm and the willingness to invest in research and development, "economists in the United States and official U.S. public policy has been in favor of protecting smaller firms."
18. Hall, GR, Johnson, RE. "Transfers of U.S. aerospace technology to Japan," The technology factor in international trade (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1970).
19. Johnson, HG. "Comments on the Hall and Johnson paper," The technology factor in international trade, Vernon (ed.), (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1970).
20. Simon, DF. "International business and the transborder movement of technology: A dialectic perspective," in Agmon and Von Glinow (eds.), Technology transfer in international business (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).
21. von Hippel, E. "Successful industrial products from customer ideas," Journal of marketing (January 1978);
22. "Get new products from customers," Harvard business review (March/April 1982);
23. "Lead users: A source of novel product concepts," Management science (July 1986);
24. and "Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation," Management science (April 1994).
25. Bailetti, AJ, Guild, PD. "Designers' impressions of direct contact between product designers and champions of innovation," Journal of product innovation management, vol. 8 (1991a).
26. Modifications to this search procedure have been suggested by Bailetti and Guild (1991a, 1991b). They suggest a more face-to-face approach to searching for user innovation. This requires a multidisciplinary team which is then exposed to "carefully selected outside sources of knowledge." In either case there is no disagreement about the notion that product users are a fruitful source of product innovation that can be built into the existing product line and exploited by the manufacturer.
27. Aharoni, Cf. "Education and Technology Transfer," (1982).
28. Godkin, L. "Problems and practicalities of technology transfer: A survey of the literature," International journal of technology management, vol. 3 (1988).
29. Rodgers, EM, Valente, TW. "Technology transfer in high-technology industries," in Agmon and M. A. Von Glinow (eds.), Technology transfer in international business (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).
30. Yoffie, Cf. "From comparative advantage to regulated competition," (1993).
31. Kedia, BL, Bhagat, RS. "Cultural constraints on the transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international comparative management," Academy of management review, vol. 3 (1988).
32. Trompenaars, F. Riding the waves of culture: understanding diversity in global business (Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1994).
33. Hofstede, G. Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1980).
34. Adler, NJ. International dimensions of organizational behavior (Boston: Kent, 1986).
35. Laurent, A. "The cultural diversity of western conceptions of management," International studies of management and organizations, vol. XIII, Spring-Summer (1983).
36. Glenn, ES, Glenn, CG. Man and mankind: conflict and communication between cultures (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1982).
37. Pucik, V. "Technology transfer in strategic alliances: Competitive collaboration and organizational learning," in Agmon and Von Glinow (eds.), Technology transfer in international business (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).
38. Teece, DJ. (ed.), "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy," The competitive challenge: strategies for industrial innovation and renewal (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1986).
39. Itami, H. Mobilizing invisible assets (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987). Johnson and Kaplan (1987) argue that the accumulation of invisible assets has not been a high priority in many Western firms because the financial measurements and accounting systems of these companies are focused on the visible assets of the firm.
40. Von Glinow, Cf, MA, Schnepp, O, Bhambri, A. Technology transfer in international business. These authors describe the typical participants in such negotiations. Usually a key individual will be found on the American side of the negotiation. This person enjoys strong support from the home office and has wide-ranging authority to make decisions. Being in the spotlight, the person can reasonably be expected to want to achieve visible results as quickly as possible, preferably through the exercise of individual authority. For Chinese negotiators, the decision-making process is not nearly as transparent, and information concerning this decision-making process is not easily available to foreign participants. The delegation is usually led by a senior official, but decisions are based on a consensus among the agencies and government bureaus concerned with the transfer of a particular technology. While time-consuming, the consensus process protects the Chinese participants from later criticism and possible recriminations.
41. Schnepp, O, Von Glinow, MA, Bhambri, A. US-China transfer (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).
42. Grow, RF. "Comparing Japanese and American technology transfer in China: Assessing the 'fit' between foreign firms and Chinese enterprises," in Agmon and Von Glinow (eds.). Technology transfer in international business, op. cit.
43. Markusen, JR, Venables, AJ. "Multinational firms and the new trade theory," National bureau of economic research, Working paper No. 5036 (1995).
44. Gruber, WH, Vernon, R. "The technology factor in a world trade matrix," in Vernon (ed.). The technology factor in international trade (National Bureau of Economic Research, 1970).